|
HISTORY AND CULTURE: In-Your-Sleep Moralizing
By Victor Davis Hanson
The United States may make an easy target for Amnesty International, the United Nations, and the Europeans. But it’s our military that protects Western civilization. By Victor Davis Hanson.
To paraphrase the ancient Greeks, it is easy to be
moral in your sleep. Abstract ethics or soapbox lectures demanding
superhuman perfection mean little without deeds.
Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other
global humanitarian groups recently expressed criticism over the slated
trial of the accused mass murderer Saddam Hussein. Such self-appointed
auditors of moral excellence were worried that his legal representation was
inadequate. Or perhaps they felt the court of the new Iraqi democracy was
not quite up to the standards of wigged European judges in The Hague.
Relay those concerns to the nearly one million silent
souls butchered by Saddam’s dictatorship. Once they waited in vain
for any such international human rights organization to stop the murdering.
None could or did.
Now these global watchdogs are barking about
legalities—now that Saddam is in
shackles, thanks solely to the American military (which, too, is often criticized by the same utopian-minded groups). The new
Iraqi government is sanctioned by vote and
attuned to global public opinion. Saddam Hussein was neither. So Amnesty International can safely chastise
the Iraqi government for supposed misdemeanors after it did little concrete
about the real felonies of Saddam.
We’ve seen many examples of this in-your-sleep
moralizing. United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan pronounced from on
high that the American effort to remove Saddam was
“illegal”—this after moral paragons in the Security
Council like China and France chose not to sanction the enforcement of
their own resolutions.
Mr. Annan presided over a callous, scandalous
oil-for-food program that starved millions with the connivance of
international financial players, among them his own son. Again, it is
easier to grandstand on television than curb illicit profits or be firm
with a killer in the real world.
Europeans, especially, demand heaven on earth. The
European Union is now pressuring the United States to turn over its
exclusive control of the Internet, which it invented and developed, to the
United Nations. So far the Americans, so unlike a Saudi Arabia or China,
have not blocked users from net access, and freely adjudicate the World
Wide Web according to transparent protocols.
That would never be true of the United Nations. If
Iran or Zimbabwe were to end up on the Human Rights Commission, then they
would be equally qualified to oversee the computers of millions of
Americans. The same European elites who nitpick the United States about its
sober stewardship of the Internet would be absolutely impotent once a China
or Syria began tampering with millions logging on.
We see still more in-your-sleep moralizing when it
comes to the topic of global warming. The heating up of the
planet—and the American rejection of the Kyoto Protocol that was
supposed to arrest it—is a keen source of anti-Americanism,
especially in Europe.
Of course, global warming is a real problem,
especially in Arctic regions. China has become the second-largest emitter
of greenhouse gases next to the United States, accomplishing in 20 years
what took us 100 to achieve. Yet European governments will not say much to
China—it holds too much Western debt and is a lucrative market. Plus,
its generals sometimes crazily talk of sending off nuclear missiles or
annexing Taiwan outright.
What do all these recent examples have in common? In
the world of utopianism, we see that refined reason, not force, reigns.
That may be admirable, but, unfortunately, abstract moralizing has little
to do with a real world in which brutes abound.
So instead, to maintain the idealistic facade,
sleepwalking moralizers chastise those who listen and are
civilized—but see nothing, hear nothing, and speak nothing about
those in the moral abyss. Not so long ago, they argued in Brussels over the next E.U. resolution condemning
violence in the Balkans, while Slobodan
Milosevic butchered another 10,000 next door.
Then there is the psychological element. When one is
fearful and impotent, reassurance is found in processes, resolutions, and
lectures, both here and abroad—anything to find conviction that one
is at least doing something when in reality doing nothing. So one can
scream about a mythical flushed Koran in Guantanamo and silently shrug that
another 50,000 were killed by Islamic fanatics in Darfur.
Americans are easy targets of Kofi Annan, Amnesty
International, and Europeans. Our military in the shadows alone protects
Westernized civilization, which makes these groups’ existence both
possible and sustainable. Private jets, international finance, and global
commerce—the world of the U.N. diplomat, concerned corporate CEO, or
international celebrity activist—is also a product of the
U.S.-sponsored military-commercial-industrial system. Everyone from Mick
Jagger and Bono to Michael Moore and Madonna partake in it and are enriched
by it. But such dependency and familiarity with the solicitous parent
America apparently can breed contempt.
So Americans increasingly tune out the United
Nations, Amnesty International, and other once-respected bodies like the
Nobel Prize Committee. That’s
unfortunate, given the noble charters of these groups. But for all these agencies’ moralizing, they increasingly prove
quite immoral themselves.
This essay appeared in the Washington Times on October 29, 2005.
Victor Davis Hanson is the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. He is a classicist and an expert on the history of war. A regular contributor to National Review Online and many other national and international publications, he has written or edited sixteen books, including theNew York Times bestseller Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power. His most recent book is A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War. He was awarded a National Humanities Medal by President Bush in 2007.
|