|
LATIN AMERICA: What Latin America Owes to the "Chicago Boys"
By Gary S. Becker
Economists educated at the University of Chicago have for some two decades been putting free market reforms into effect in Chile, Argentina, and other Latin American countries. One of their teachers, Nobel Prize–winner and Hoover fellow Gary S. Becker, examines the results. What does he find? Dictatorships that have been turned into democracies and economic stagnation that has been transformed into growth.
On my first visit to South America in the early 1980s, I heard a candidate
in the Colombian presidential elections attack the "Chicago boys." These
were not remnants of Al Capone's gang but Latin American economists
educated in the Department of Economics of the University of Chicago. I
was impressed that our former students were important enough to be in a
presidential election--and shocked that they were apparently so unpopular.
Chicago boys generally advocated widespread deregulation,
privatization, and other free market policies for closely controlled
economies. They rose to fame as leaders of the early reforms initiated in
Chile during the rule of General Augusto Pinochet. Chicagoans were
attacked partly because central planning and government controls were
still advocated by economists in that region.
The Chicago boys took a lot of heat for agreeing to work for
Pinochet. Like most generals who seize power, he initially ran the
economy as a centrally directed, military-type system. Only after this
approach failed did he, in desperation, turn to the free market policies
advocated by the Chicagoans. In retrospect, their willingness to work for a
cruel dictator and start a different economic approach was one of the best
things that happened to Chile.
Pariah Nation
In the past, Chile and other Latin nations did not have competitive
capitalism but a cozy system of monopoly capitalism, where high tariffs
kept out more-efficient foreign competition and where domestic
companies received subsidized government loans and other favors. Unions
liked the system, too, since they had rigid job protection legislation and
often controlled medical insurance premiums and other programs. The
elderly received generous retirement and health benefits financed by
heavy taxes on younger workers.
This system of providing political favors to powerful interest
groups was highly inefficient and produced stagnant economies. After a
bad start, the revolutionary economic reforms initiated in Chile caused
that economy to boom beyond the wildest expectations even of their
|
CHILE AND ARGENTINA WERE SOON FOLLOWED DOWN THE PATH
OF FREE MARKET POLICIES BY MEXICO, PERU, BOLIVIA, AND
COLOMBIA.
|
teachers at Chicago; Chile's annual growth in per capita real income from
1985 to 1996 averaged a remarkable 5 percent, far above the rest of Latin
America.
Chile went from a pariah nation controlled by a dictator to an
economic role model for the whole undeveloped world. Chile's performance
became still more impressive when the government was transformed into
a democracy.
Other nations began to believe that free market reforms could also
help them. Chile's success especially grated on its large rival, Argentina.
Decades of abysmal economic policies had reduced Argentina from, at the
start of the century, among the top ten nations in per capita income to
about seventy-fifth.
Rocky Road
In 1989, Argentina elected the Peronist Carlos Saúl Menem, who continued
the interventionist policies that nation had so long endured. But Menem
quickly realized that these, too, were failing and asked Domingo Cavallo, a
Harvard University–educated economist sympathetic to Chicago-style
policies, to initiate a radical freeing of Argentina's economy. This ended
the long period of stagnation, and the nation began to grow rapidly, even
weathering the sharp recession in 1992 caused by Mexico's financial
troubles. Cavallo was recently replaced by a Chicago graduate, Roque
Fernandez, who continued the reform, which has generated violence in the
provinces, where unemployment is high.
Chile and Argentina were soon followed down the path of free
market policies by Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Colombia. Although the road
has occasionally been rocky, these nations generally reversed their
|
THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC REVOLUTION THAT THE CHICAGO
BOYS SPURRED IS UNLIKELY TO BE REVERSED.
|
economic stagnation, began to grow more rapidly, raised living standards,
and sharply increased exports. Meanwhile, countries like Brazil and
Venezuela, which have been slow to introduce reform, experienced greater
difficulties and grew more slowly.
Free market reforms have not solved all the problems of Latin
American societies. For example, a recent World Bank study documents
that this region has greater economic inequality than other regions of the
world, in good part because schooling and other human capital investments
in the poor have been inadequate.
Although unions and older business families accustomed to special
privileges stand ready to promote the old mercantilist policies should
Latin economies falter, the changes initiated by the Chicago boys in Chile
have spurred an economic and political revolution in Latin America that is
unlikely to be reversed. Their teachers are proud of their richly deserved
glory.
Reprinted from BusinessWeek, June 9, 1997, from an article entitled "Latin America Owes a Lot to Its 'Chicago Boys.'" Used with permission.
Available from the Hoover Press are The Essence of Becker, a volume of essays by the Nobel Prize–winning economist, and The Economic Way of Thinking: The Nobel Lecture, published as a Classic in the Hoover Institution's Essays in Public Policy series. To order a copy of either, call 800-935-2882.
Gary S. Becker, who won the Nobel Memorial Prize for Economic Science in 1992, is the Rose-Marie and Jack R. Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and University Professor of Economics and Sociology at the University of Chicago. He is an expert in human capital, economics of the family, and economic analysis of crime, discrimination, and population. His current research focuses on habits and addictions, formation of preferences, human capital, and population growth. He is a featured monthly columnist for Business Week magazine and is one of the initial fellows of the Society of Labor Economists. In addition to being a Nobel laureate, Becker is a recipient of the 2007 Presidential Medal of Freedom.
|