|
BOOK REVIEWS: Muggles, Broomsticks, Quidditch, and Owls That Deliver Mail
By Diane Ravitch
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince by J. K. ROWLING
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
By J. K. Rowling
Scholastic Press, 2005, $29.99; 652 pages.
As reviewed by Diane Ravitch
Not long after the release of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, the sixth Harry Potter book, worldwide sales for
the series topped 270 million copies. Not only has the Harry Potter
series broken all sales records for books, but also it has
shattered a host of preconceptions about the kinds of materials
children are willing to read. Conventional wisdom has long held
that new technologies render books obsolete. Publishers of
educational materials long ago concluded that today’s
media-saturated children do not like to read and that they require
a dizzying array of graphics on each page to hold their attention.
Experts in children’s literature have been saying for many
years that children want to read only about children who look like
themselves and about situations that reflect their own lives. In
the young-adult literature market, the watchword for book marketing
and for authors has been “relevance.” Young adults, it
was widely believed, want to read about contemporaries who are
struggling with contemporary problems in contemporary settings. A
quarter of a billion books by J. K. Rowling say that they are all
wrong.
Can So Many Kids Be Wrong?
Who is this Harry Potter, and why do so many
millions of children (and adults) stand in line to buy the latest
installment of his adventures? I have my own views about this,
which I will expound upon in a minute, but I thought I would first report
what my grandson Aidan said. Aidan, 11, has read all of the Potter
books and knows every detail about every character. He likes the books,
he said, “because they have action, surprise, suspense, and magic
spells.”
By now, the whole literate world knows the
basic storyline of the Harry Potter epic. Harry is an orphan; his
parents were killed by the evil Lord Voldemort when Harry was a
year old (the jagged scar on his forehead is a memento of this
fearsome event). He lives unhappily with his mean relatives, the
Dursleys. At the invitation of a great wizard, Harry has been
enrolled in Hogwarts, a boarding school for wizards, where he
develops intense friendships and learns to use his magical powers.
Voldemort, who represents the dark side of the magic world, wants
to kill Harry and assert his evil dominion (the other wizards are
so frightened of Voldemort that they call him
“he-who-must-not-be-named”). Because of his special
powers and his goodness, Harry is the only one who can defeat
Voldemort. In the first book, Harry is 11; each book covers another
year of adventures and explores the pedagogy of wizardry at
Hogwarts. The series is supposed to conclude with the next book,
which will describe Harry’s seventh and last year, at which
time all of the puzzles associated with the evil Lord Voldemort
will be resolved.
What are the attractions of these books for
their readers? They have a lot of action. They are extremely well
plotted. The plot line involves numerous subplots, each of which
touches on the fate of Harry and his friends. Some of the
characters are highly sympathetic, others are villainous. Harry and
his friends are realistic, seeming like any children of their age. The whole story is
situated in a particular place (England), with its particular language
and idioms. Yet once the characters board the train for Hogwarts at
King’s Cross Station in London, they enter an alternative
universe, one that is magical, fantastical, and utterly different from
reality.
At Hogwarts, there are games that are found
nowhere else (“quidditch” is the school-wide field
competition, played in the air on broomsticks). There is a special
vocabulary used only by wizards (nonwizards are known as
“muggles”). Fantastic things happen: there are
portraits that move and talk, ghosts that are friendly, and owls
that deliver the mail. At Hogwarts, students of wizardry learn such
subjects as potions, spells, defense against the dark arts, and
other subjects necessary for students of wizardry. The line between
fantasy and reality is constantly crossed; students worry about
exams, and their teachers are as warm or caustic as teachers in an
ordinary school. But unlike a regular school, the teachers might
turn out to be deadly enemies, secret disciples of the evil
Voldemort. The devotees of the Harry Potter novels quickly master
the special language of Hogwarts, of course, and there are many web
sites on which readers discuss their theories about what might
happen next.
Although the Harry Potter novels are written
for preadolescents and adolescents, they apparently have a
substantial adult following. Now that the books are treated as a
cultural and commercial phenomenon, each new one receives
respectful reviews by major critics. What matters most about the
Harry Potter books, I think, is that they demonstrate the power of
literature to captivate the age group that is considered least likely to read: adolescents. J.
K. Rowling does not condescend to her readers with a dumbed-down
vocabulary or a simple plot. She does not rely on glitzy visuals to
grab their attention. Her books have few graphics: a simple
black-and-white line drawing introduces each chapter, and everything
else is text. Rowling expects her readers to read: the latest book has
652 pages. Rowling has a faith in the power of language that our own
National Council of Teachers of English seems to have lost.
Somehow millions of Harry Potter fans manage
to complete every book without benefit of leading questions, a
teacher’s guide, previsioning, or any of the other junk
pedagogical strategies that burden American schoolchildren in their
English classes. They respond to and appreciate an author who is a
powerful storyteller with a terrific imagination.
It is sad that many schools avoid the Harry
Potter books in order to placate certain religious sects that
oppose any reference to magic and witchcraft. Under such pressures,
the publishers of reading books for our schools exclude any stories
that involve fantasy and illusion. The Harry Potter books have
often appeared on the American Library Association’s list of
the most-banned books. This is enough to keep them out of public
schools, but not out of the hearts of the millions of young people
who love Harry Potter and despise the small-minded Dursleys, who
ride with Harry on the train to Hogwarts, cheer for him as he leads
his quidditch team to victory, stand alongside him as he challenges
the forces of evil, and pray that he survives the violent
confrontation with Lord Voldemort that inevitably lies ahead.
Diane Ravitch is research professor of
education at New York University and a member of the Koret Task
Force at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
|