Articles
& Papers
A Second Look at Habitat
"It's
Time to Take Habitat for Humanity Seriously" by Howard Husock
City Journal, Summer 1995. Conservatives treat Habitat for
Humanity lightly, writes Husock, because of its affiliation with
former president Jimmy Carter. But Habitat is fast becoming the
biggest homebuilder in America and offers a program that draws
on conservative ideals. The organization builds modest new houses
in the belief that low-income families will maintain orderly neighborhoods
if they own their own homes. To qualify, a low-income applicant
must meet rigorous standards of responsibility. A prospective
owner must participate in the construction of his home. Habitat
then offers the owner an interest-free mortgage. The owner must
also help build someone else's home, and his house is repossessed
if he defaults on the payments. The result, in many cases: Safe,
clean neighborhoods and low-income homeowners with pride and a
stake in an orderly and prosperous community. All of the money
used in Habitat's construction projects comes from private sources. Manhattan
Institute -- tel: 212-599-7000, fax: 212-599-3494.
Foundation Fossils
" Philanthropical Correctness" by
David Samuels The New Republic, Sept. 18 & 25, 1995
Although their assets have tripled in the last 25 years, Samuels
contends that America's philanthropic foundations have become
irrelevant to public policy. The foundations that once funded
the discovery of the polio vaccine and the expansion of our public
library system cannot boast such lofty achievements today. Samuels
cites four reasons. First, rather than fund programs that offer
practical solutions to failures in education, welfare, and crimefighting,
these foundations fund multicultural programs designed to promote
"diversity" and "tolerance." Second, these
foundations give more money to liberal advocacy groups like the
Children's Defense Fund than they give to university research.
Third, foundations no longer subject grantees to independent scholarly
review but rely on foundation bureaucrats with little policy expertise.
Finally, these foundations suffer from inbreeding and parochialism.
Nearly 40 percent of foundation CEOs are hired from within the
nonprofit sector, 30 percent from within their own foundations.
The result: chronic myopia. Obsessed with multicultural concerns
and hamstrung by stale thinking, our leading foundations pay little
attention to our society's most pressing issues.The New Republic -- tel:
202-331-7494, Web site: http://www.enews.com/magazines/tnr/,
e-mail: tnr@aol.com.
Wilsonian Liberals
"Liberalism's
Lost Tradition" by Fred Siegel & Will Marshall The New Democrat, Sept./Oct. 1995
Writing in the Democratic Leadership
Council's house magazine, Fred Siegel and Will Marshall assure
Democrats fearful of obsolescence that one tradition within liberalism
might accord with America's repudiation of New Deal statism. Woodrow
Wilson's "New Freedom" liberalism took aim at the concentration
of power in turn-of-the-century corporate America by curbing trusts.
Siegel and Marshall suggest that today's Democrats should direct
this ideological animus toward our centralized federal government.
During the 1912 presidential contest between Wilson and Theodore
Roosevelt, they note, Roosevelt was supported by both corporate
moguls and social workers. These odd bedfellows were united in
a "common condescension" for the common man. Wilson
criticized paternalism, argued against social planning by either
corporate monopolies or by a large, interventionist federal government,
and championed individual and economic liberty. Siegel and Marshall
urge today's Democrats to tap into this lost "anti-statist
but radically democratic" tradition by breaking the federal
government's monopoly over public decisionmaking and resources. Democratic Leadership Council -- tel: 202-546-0007, fax: 202-544-5002.
Drafted
Volunteers
"Charity Begins at School" by Chester E.
Finn Jr. & Gregg Vanourek Commentary, Oct. 1995
Government
by the people or people by the government? Hudson Institute Scholars
Finn and Vanourek assess mandatory community service in our schools.
Finn and Vanourek oppose "compulsory-service learning"
because it confuses political action with community service and
hence promotes projects with an ideological cast. In Cecil County,
Maryland, students earned credit for lobbying the county government
to maintain its recycling program. Furthermore, mandated volunteer
service is itself an oxymoron that obscures the virtue of true
voluntarism. And who's to say which student projects meet service
requirements? In Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, a high-school student
was denied her diploma because the time she spent volunteering
in a nursing home and for Meals on Wheels was not school-directed
service. Finally, the authors claim that mandatory service threatens
church-based and private-sector volunteer work. In the near-term,
mandatory service monopolizes the time children might otherwise
devote to private-sector charity, and it discourages private-sector
voluntarism in the long-run by teaching children that voluntarism
is no more fulfilling than writing lab reports and meeting paper
deadlines. Commentary -- tel: 212-751-4400, fax: 212-751-1174.
Vo-Tech
Strikes Out
"The President's Apprentices" by Jonathan
Marshall Reason, March 1995
Faced with declining wages
for high-school graduates, the Clinton administration has embraced
school-to-work programs. But Marshall argues that students put
through the paces of vocational training are no better off in
the long-term than students who go the strictly academic route.
A recent National Assessment of Vocational Education study reports
that graduates of vocational education in California are employed
at the same rates and earn about as much as general track graduates.
In fact, according to a Labor Department report released last
year, many male graduates of vocational education actually earn
less than those who have graduated from traditional high school
programs. The central difficulty seems to be that graduates of
vocational education often do not obtain jobs that match their
training. In Germany, where most trained bakers work for Ford
Motor Company, only half of German apprenticeship graduates work
in the fields in which they were trained. Consequently, some studies
show that students might do better to delay career choices until
they gain more work experience and until they can better direct
their career training. The bottom line: Inefficient, vocational
education provides no quick fix to the falling wages of low-income
Americans. Reason Foundation -- tel: 310-391-2245, fax: 310-391-4395.
Land
of Opportunity
"Why Koreans Succeed" by Heather Mac Donald City Journal, Spring 1995
Mac Donald assures us that
the American dream is alive and epitomized by Korean-American
grocers in New York. Their success, she argues, is fueled by the
same factors that have enabled other immigrant groups to succeed:
hard work, an emphasis on education, and strong community ties.
Some of these factors manifest themselves in distinctly Korean
ways. Korean communities form gaes, or communal savings pools,
to provide interest-free loans to budding businessmen. And many
Korean children boost their academic achievement by attending
a hagwon or "prep school" after school and on weekends.
But Mac Donald warns that America has grown economically and culturally
hostile towards Korean entrepreneurship. New York City requires
grocers to pay 14 different taxes and obtain numerous licenses;
Koreans also endure race-based boycotts and racial crimes. Consequently,
Korean immigration has slowed to a trickle and some are returning
home. Urban America will suffer if Korean entrepreneurship is
stifled. By introducing stable and successful businesses to low-income
neighborhoods in New York and Los Angeles, Koreans have spearheaded
urban renewal. Many Koreans are still committed to building successful
businesses here. Will we let them? Manhattan Institute -- tel:
212-599-7000, fax: 212-599-3494.
Hired Off the Streets
"From
Underclass to Working Class" by James L. Payne The American
Enterprise, Sept./Oct. 1995
The Dallas branch of the Industrial
Labor Service Corp. (ILS) proves that the invisible hand can be
a helping hand. ILS, Payne reports, is the largest employer of
temporary laborers in Dallas. It hires from among Dallas's down-and-out.
ILS pays these workers $4.70 an hour but charges companies $7.50
an hour for their services. ILS uses the difference to provide
its workers with lodging, breakfast and lunch, transportation,
and tools, and it makes a profit of 17 cents an hour per worker.
Unlike most private charities touted by conservatives, ILS is
primarily profit-driven. It does not demand its "clients"
change personal habits and attitudes as many faith-based charities
do. But, Payne reports, laborers find ILS benevolent (it provides
lunch out of generosity, not a desire to raise productivity).
And they also learn the lesson of exchange-you have to give something
to receive something-that many charities try to instill by demanding
behavioral or spiritual change in exchange for material aid. Payne
warns that "working halls" like ILS are threatened by
the news media and the government, which accuse them of exploitation. American
Enterprise Institute -- tel: 202-862-5800, fax: 202-862-7178, E-mail:
75272.1226@compuserve.com.
Black Christian Schools
"The
New Exodus" by Joe Maxwell World, April 15, 1995
In 1954,
Brown v. Board of Education paved the way for the integration
of public schools. Many black families abandoned Christian schools
in favor of integrated public education. Forty years later, Maxwell
reports, blacks are returning. Nearly 10 percent of African-American
children from kindergarten to fifth grade attend private schools,
up from 3.8 percent in 1968. Maxwell argues that black parents
appreciate the discipline and the unambiguous moral education
their children receive at these schools. They are happy that their
children are required to wear uniforms, that the school environment
they send their children to is drug-, gang-, and violence-free,
and that prayer is an essential component of their children's
school day. The revival of black Christian academies is hardly
the result of separatist sentiment. Their main agenda is providing
excellent Christian education. The rise of such schools is an
indictment of poor public education. In the words of one supporter,
"How many more generations of black children's education
are we going to allow to be destroyed . . . by an incompetent,
costly, self-serving government education establishment?" World -- tel:
704-253-8063.
Mormon Charity
" Work, Not Welfare
in the Mormon Church" by Ralph Hardy The American Enterprise,
Sept./Oct. 1995
Sixty years ago, at the dawn of the welfare state
and its "culture of dependence," the Mormon Church built
its own welfare program on the principle of individual responsibility.
At the center of this system lies the "bishops' storehouse."
Akin to a discount retailer like Price Club, it warehouses foodstuffs
and other essentials. At times throughout the year, Mormons volunteer
their labor on farms that supply the storehouse. Mormons also
fast on the first Sunday of every month, and the money that would
have been spent on skipped meals is used to purchase items for
the storehouse. When a Mormon bishop determines that a truly needy
individual or family has no other means of support, such as relatives
in another state, he may offer food and supplies from the church's
storehouse. In exchange, recipients are usually required to perform
some service for the church community and to search for employment,
with the church's help. Hardy argues that his church's system
is one antidote to the maladies of our current welfare system.American
Enterprise Institute -- tel: 202-862-5800, fax: 202-862-7178, e-mail:
75272.1226@compuserve.com.
Future Businessmen
"New
Kids on the Block: The National Foundation for Teaching Entrepreneurship" by
Martin Morse Wooster Philosophy, Culture and Society, June
1995
After being mugged on a Bronx street in 1981, businessman
Steve Mariotti wondered why bright inner-city kids would risk
their futures for the paltry $10 they stole from him. Mariotti
wanted to help at-risk children learn how to calculate risk and
reward for legitimate ends. Because schools often do not give
students the practical skills and work habits that lead to success
in business, Mariotti established the National Foundation for
Teaching Entrepreneurship (NFTE) in 1986. Today, NFTE operates
in nine urban centers, including New York City, Boston, and Philadelphia.
Its budget has grown from $600,000 in 1991 to $5.5 million today,
thanks to charitable contributions from foundations and other
sources. And what does this money buy? Student entrepreneurs are
given business cards, a $10 bank account, $50 for start-up costs,
and the opportunity to read the Wall Street Journal once a week.
With this start, students build their own small businesses and
learn about profit, loss, finance, marketing, negotiation, and
customer service. Greg Blair sells trading cards. Regina Jackson
markets the jewelry she makes. Low-income minority students are
the target of this program. In Washington, D.C., nearly all of
the approximately 250 students who participate in NFTE are low-income
African Americans. Consequently, the textbooks used in NFTE classes,
one of which is co-authored by Mariotti, profile the entrepreneurial
successes of formerly disadvantaged minorities. Wooster's reporting
is choc-full of heart-warming anecdotes garnered from his visits
to NFTE programs in D.C. schools. He concludes that NFTE fills
a valuable niche: It is the one program that actually shows inner-city
youth a path to success different from one littered with violence
and despair. Capital Research Center -- tel: 202-393-2600, fax:
202-393-2626.
Welfare as We Will Know It
"Ending the Welfare State, Pts. I and II" Alternatives in Philanthropy,
April & May 1995
In this two-part series, 14 leading conservatives
propose alternatives to the welfare state. David Forte wants to
bolster private charities by offering taxpayers a 110 percent
tax deduction for charitable contributions. William Tucker thinks
that for every hour a person spends doing volunteer work, he or
she should be rewarded with a tax credit equal to his or her regular
earned income per hour. Charles D. Hobbs suggests making working
more profitable than welfare by subsidizing private-sector employment
for welfare recipients. George Liebmann argues that we should
model day care in the U.S. after the British, who rely heavily
on parent-organized and volunteer-run cooperative playgroups.
Michael Tanner urges that adoption be eased by lifting restrictions
on transracial adoption, terminating the custodial rights of biological
parents whose children have been in foster care for a year, and
by ending funding formulas that encourage states to keep as many
children as possible in the foster care system. Michael Novak
argues that teen moms should be blocked from setting up independent
households, while Elizabeth Fox-Genovese advocates placing them
and their children in maternity homes. The proposals assume that,
absent welfare, the private-sector holds the answers to our social
problems. Capital Research Center -- tel: 202-393-2600, fax: 202-393-2626.
Table of Contents
News
& Events
Alumni Activists
Citizens concerned
about the recent intellectual and moral shortcomings of academe
will want to know about the National Alumni Forum, founded last
year by a group of scholars, editors, businessmen, and policymakers
led by chairman Lynne Cheney. The group enlists university alumni
to defend academic freedom on college campuses. The group hopes
to spur concerned alumni to exert more influence over university
policies; it publishes information via a newsletter, an electronic
network, and research reports. It also helps alumni oppose speech
codes and highlights programs at various universities that are
worthy of alumni support. National Alumni Forum -- tel: 202-467-6787,
fax: 202-467-6784, e-mail: 76544.1367@compuserve.com, Web site:
http://www.wdcnet.com/National_Alumni_Forum/NafHome.html
Carrying
the Torch
The Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games recently
sponsored a nationwide search for "community heroes"
to carry the torch in this summer's Torch Relay. About 5,500 honorees
will carry the torch. A hero, as defined by the sponsors, is "a
person who through his/her selfless acts or achievements has positively
influenced their community, functioning as a role model for others."
Winners will be announced in February.
Move Over, Roger Ebert
The U.S. Catholic Conference now offers a toll-free movie-review service
that rates films by moral content and artistic merit. Brief reviews
accompany ratings, which range from "A-1" (general audiences)
to "O" (morally objectionable). It lauds Martin Scorsese
for his direction in Casino but rates the movie "O"
for its "graphic violence, fleeting nudity, substance abuse,
and incessant rough language." U.S. Catholic Conference - tel:
1-800-311-4CCC.
Movieguide Hotline promises reviews "from
a Biblical perspective." Operated by the nondenominational
Christian nonprofit Good News Communications, it rates movies
for quality and moral acceptability. While Seven receives three
of four possible stars for artistic merit, it is deemed morally
unacceptable for its "virulent religious bigotry." Movieguide
does differ from its Catholic counterpart; you are charged $1.49
per-minute.Movieguide Hotline - tel: 1-900-234-2344.
Submissions Welcome
Town Square is intended as an interactive resource for our readers. Policy Review welcomes suggestions for publications, events, and news for inclusion. Contact: Policy Review, 214 Massachusetts Ave., N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002. Tel: 202-546-4400 Fax: 202-608-6136. E-mail: polrev@hoover.stanford.edu
Table of Contents
Pope John Paul II on Democracy
Democracy cannot be sustained
without a shared commitment to certain moral truths about the
human person and human community. The basic question before a
democratic society is: "How ought we live together?"
In seeking an answer to this question, can society exclude moral
truth and moral reasoning? Can the Biblical wisdom that played
such a formative part in the very founding of your country be
excluded from the debate? Would not doing so mean that America's
founding documents no longer have any defining content, but are
only the formal dressing of changing opinion? Would not doing
so mean that tens of millions of Americans could no longer offer
the contribution of their deepest convictions to the formation
of public policy? Every generation of Americans needs to know
that freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having
the right to do what we ought. -- Baltimore, Md., Oct. 8,
1995
Table of Contents
Sen. Bill Bradley on Civil Society
What both Democrats
and Republicans fail to see is that the government and the market
are not enough to make a civilization. There must also be a healthy,
robust civic sector-a space in which the bonds of community can
flourish. Government and the market are similar to two legs on
a three-legged stool. Without the third leg of civil society,
the stool is not stable and cannot provide support for a vital
America. . . . We also have to give the distinctive moral language
of civil society a more permanent place in our public conversation.
The language of the marketplace says, "Get as much as you
can for yourself." The language of government says, "Legislate
for others what is good for them." But the language of community,
family and citizenship at its core is about receiving undeserved
gifts. What this nation needs to promote is the spirit of giving
something freely, without measuring it out precisely or demanding
something in return. -- speech, National Press Club, Feb.
9, 1995
Table of Contents
Recent Stories in Policy Review
Fall 1995