|
ETCETERA: No Excuses for Failing Our Children
By Rev. Floyd H. Flake
Some final thoughts on school choice
America has been committed to equal opportunity in education ever since the
historic Brown vs. Board of Education decision of 1954. But our country will never
be able to achieve this commitment until we open up choice and competition in our
inner-city schools.
The majority of children in our inner cities are not
learning. Test scores are abysmal, graduation rates are atrocious, and overall performance
is so low that many schools have been shut down altogether. Entire school districts have
been taken over by state boards of education.
This collapse of public education is devastating to urban communities
and the people who live there. Families refuse to purchase homes in neighborhoods where
schools are failing. The stability of inner-city communities, like that of the suburbs, is
determined by their ability to attract strong families. Communities that cannot offer
families good schools are condemned to failure and deterioration.
What happens to the children is even worse. When children cant
read or do even elementary math, they are doomed in a 21st-century economy. We are further
marginalizing an entire community that is already socially and economically isolated. We
only hurt ourselves when we produce a bumper crop of workers cursed to compete in
international markets with unacceptable skills.
The current political order is unwilling to rock the boat.
Co-conspiring politicians remain wedded to a system of waste and mediocrity because of the
fundraising prowess of teachers unions and other interest groups. Inner city politicians,
whose children more often than not attend private schools or the best public schools, are
protecting a system that discourages reform, chokes choice, and ultimately condemns
children to a life of social and economic dysfunction.
I am not against public schools. I am against unresponsive and
irresponsible public schools where educational mediocrity goes unchallenged. I am against
public schools that only expect the least from our children. I am against public schools
where improvement is stifled by strict union rules and regulations. I am against public
schools that imitate the despair of their surrounding neighborhoods and fail to conquer
that despair with the tools of learning and the virtue of hope.
There is no excuse for this. Poor children can learn. Set the standards
high, and children will meet those standards. I know, because my wife and I run a school
where inner-city children do succeed. We have 482 students at Allen Christian School, many
of them poor. Their parents are making an enormous sacrifice to send them here. We have
hundreds on our waiting list. If we had 1,500 places as so many failing public schools do,
I am confident we could easily fill them all. The same is true for hundreds of private
schools in New York and other cities.
There are countless children floundering in public schools, who would
flourish in schools like Allen. These children have parents who want a better education
for their children. But the public schools are unresponsive to them, and they cannot
afford tuition for private school.
I am not against public schools. I am against public schools
where educational mediocrity goes unchallenged.
Vouchers empower these families. Parents who now
are passive recipients of second-rate educational decisions will be transformed by
vouchers into powerful consumers who hold the fate of schools in their hands. Teachers and
administrators will face greater accountability in places that, for over a generation,
have failed to produce good schools. Parents will sit in the places of power where once
sat politicians and unions.
With a voucher in Washington, D.C. or New York City where the per pupil
funding for public schools approaches $10,000, new vistas of opportunity would confront
poor parents. Not only would less expensive religious schools be viable options for
children, but the more expensive elite schools would now be in range for poor families.
Every teacher I know wishes parents were more engaged in their
childrens education. What more engaged role is there for any parent than to decide
where their child will attend school?
Some say vouchers will "cream" inner- city schools, that
better students will leave the system, reducing resources for the poor students who are
left behind. But poorer students have already been left behind. Most families who could do
so have already moved to the suburbs or sent their children to special magnet schools.
Some say there arent enough seats in the private system to meet
the needs of inner-city students. Vouchers would help churches and other private
institutions multiply the seats available.
In Brown vs. Board of Education the Supreme Court held that when
public education cannot deliver equal opportunity for every child, it must move to a new
delivery system. Nothing in our Constitution says public funding for education requires
that it be delivered by the current construct. All citizens, including those in the
inner-city, deserve a quality education and vouchers offer the best hope for delivering it
to every child.
|