- search:
-
hoover.org
-
archives
-
library
President Obama’s new nuclear policy is ill-timed and ill-conceived.
While the administration is still beating the health-care horse, and offering more utopian notions about nuclear weapons (e.g., Why go nuclear, logical and rational Iran, when we won't use such weapons against you, even should you go chemical or nerve gas against us?), the two most dangerous developments continue to go unnoticed…
The president's new nuclear weapons policy is just the latest (should we call it “Jimmy-Cartesian”?) indication that he is determined to hasten the country’s decline, writes Tunku Varadarajan.
As Politico has pointed out, the Obama administration has a tendency to describe their every action as "unprecedented." In the case of the U.S.-Russia Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, this is actually true.
The presidents of the United States and Russia have proclaimed that they will work for a world without nuclear weapons. Vice President Joe Biden reaffirmed that goal in a recent major policy speech. But the speech was more than that...
My National Review Online column last week carried the provocative title, “How to Save the Obama Presidency: Bomb Iran,” and provoke it surely did. . . .
Circumstances are propitious, and the American people would support it. . . .
Nuclear Tipping Point is a conversation with four men intimately involved in American diplomacy and national security over the last four decades. . . .
Reminder about tomorrow’s event “Working Toward a World Without Nuclear Weapons,” with Hoover Fellows Sidney Drell and George Shultz. . . .
Maintaining confidence in our nuclear arsenal is necessary as the number of weapons goes down. . . .