Strategika

Subscribe to receive Strategika. Subscribe »

Friday, September 24, 2021

Issue 75

America After Afghanistan
Background Essay
Background Essay

Our Revels Now Are Ended

by Ralph Petersvia Strategika
Friday, September 24, 2021

It’s hard to win a war when you refuse to understand your enemy. It’s harder still when you cannot realistically define your strategic mission. You lame yourself further when you reduce a complex history to a single inaccurate cliché; i.e., “Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires.”

Featured Commentary
Featured Commentary

Afghanistan Post-Mortem

by Peter R. Mansoorvia Strategika
Friday, September 24, 2021

The United States has lost its longest war. After twenty years of conflict and nation building in Afghanistan, the U.S.-backed Afghan regime collapsed like a house of cards in just a few weeks after the announced departure of American and NATO troops from the country. A final flurry of activity by the U.S. military managed to rescue 123,000 people from Kabul, but as Winston Churchill once said of Dunkirk, “Wars are not won by evacuations.”

Featured Commentary

Dented, Not Damaged: The American Empire After Afghanistan

by Josef Joffevia Strategika
Friday, September 24, 2021

When small, even middle-sized powers make grievous mistakes like fighting a losing war or ignoring deadly threats, they risk their place in the global hierarchy or, worse, their existence. Thus did France and Britain when they failed to fight Nazi Germany in the Thirties while still in position of strategic superiority. 

E.g., 12 / 3 / 2021
E.g., 12 / 3 / 2021
Thursday, November 15, 2018

Issue 55

The Structure of World Power

Background Essay

by Josef Joffe Thursday, November 15, 2018
article

Featured Commentary

by Seth Cropsey Thursday, November 15, 2018
article
by Nadia Schadlow Thursday, November 15, 2018
article

Related Commentary

by Gordon G. Chang Thursday, November 15, 2018
article
by Giselle Donnelly Thursday, November 15, 2018
article
by Chris Gibson Thursday, November 15, 2018
article
interview with Victor Davis Hanson Monday, October 15, 2018
article
by Ralph Peters Thursday, November 15, 2018
article
by Miles Maochun Yu Thursday, November 15, 2018
article
Monday, October 15, 2018 Monday, October 15, 2018
news
Monday, October 15, 2018

Issue 54

Space Force and Warfare in Space

Background Essay

by John Yoo Monday, October 15, 2018
article

Featured Commentary

by Angelo M. Codevilla Monday, October 15, 2018
article
by Williamson Murray Monday, October 15, 2018
article
Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Issue 53

U.S. Engagement with Russia

Background Essay

by Ralph Peters Wednesday, September 5, 2018
article

Featured Commentary

by Chris Gibson Wednesday, September 5, 2018
article
by Thomas Donnelly Wednesday, September 5, 2018
article

Related Commentary

by Robert G. Kaufman Friday, February 15, 2019
article
by Peter R. Mansoor Wednesday, September 5, 2018
article
by Hy Rothstein Friday, February 15, 2019
article
Tuesday, July 31, 2018

Issue 52

Turkey and the West

Pages

Explore Research

Filter By:

Topic

Type

Author

Section

Enter comma-separated IDs of authors
Enter comma-separated IDs of contributors

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

Related Commentary

Balancing Interests and Fears

by Andrew Robertsvia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

History suggests that no two nations’ relations ever deteriorate so much that it becomes impossible to find common ground if both perceive that a third nation’s ambitions threatens them more. Examples abound, but the classic is Britain’s instant alliance with the USSR the moment that Adolf Hitler invaded Russia in June 1941.

Related Commentary

Can the United States and Russia Unite Against China? Naw…

by Ralph Petersvia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

Under present and probable future conditions, Russia will not ally with the United States against China on any substantial issue in any sphere. The wording of that sentence is carefully chosen, since the U.S.A., under any president, would be glad to have Russia’s support in the great competition of the mid-twenty-first century.

Related Commentary

A Critical Moment in U.S.–Russian Relations

by Williamson Murrayvia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

At present it is extraordinarily difficult to see how any American government—beyond former President Donald J. Trump—would be willing to trust the Russians to the degree necessary to cooperate effectively against the Chinese, at least for the short term

Related Commentary

Triangulating Russia

by Mark Moyarvia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

Russian-American relations are as poor today as at any time since the fall of the Soviet Union. Mired in prolonged conflicts over Ukraine, Syria, Venezuela, election interference, and energy, among other issues, Russia and the United States clash in their interests and their worldviews. Mutual distrust is intense, much more intense than one might infer from the occasional statements of former president Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Related Commentary

The Wedge in U.S.-Russia Relations Never Went Away

by Walter Russell Mead via Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

Each U.S. presidential administration of the 21st century has attempted some version of a “Russian reset.” George W. Bush looked into Vladimir Putin’s eyes, Obama’s Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivered Sergei Lavrov a physical “reset button,” and Donald Trump sought to form a congenial personal relationship with Putin throughout his presidency. Despite allegations of collusion, former President Trump was no more successful than his predecessors at stabilizing the relationship.

Related Commentary

Russia Will Not Be Our Friend Against China

by Jakub Grygielvia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

Russia wants to contain China on her Asian border but not on the Pacific Ocean. In fact, it is in Russia’s interest to encourage a Chinese expansion in the Pacific as well as farther out, from Europe and the Middle East to Latin America.

Related Commentary

Working with Russia: An Important Component to Checking a Rising China

by Chris Gibson via Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

With the rise of China and the civilizational challenge it presents for the rest of the world, we will soon see more of what realist theorists and historians describe as “balancing” actions by the international community to contain this potential existential threat. As part of that phenomenon, I expect U.S.-Russian relations to improve as these two countries increasingly work together to check a rising China.

Related Commentary

U.S.–Russia Enmity Defies Reason

by Angelo M. Codevillavia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

To impeach the notion that governments act rationally to maximize their own advantages, one need only look at the U.S. and Russian governments’ reluctance to act concurrently, if not jointly, to contain the biggest geopolitical threat to both: China.

Featured Commentary

Containing China

by Hy Rothsteinvia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

Deciding whether the path towards containing China is best served through improved relations with Russia correctly implies that the United States will ultimately need help to do so. The idea of aligning with any country for security is rooted in the principles of realism and balance-of-power designed to create a stabilizing equilibrium among great powers. 

Featured Commentary

Forget The Russia Card

by Josef Joffevia Strategika
Thursday, January 28, 2021

Theoretically, two superpowers—the United States and Russia—should go after China, a rising contender, to preserve the established hierarchy. But it won’t happen. For an instructive historical lesson, go back to a comparable constellation when that master of manipulation, Henry Kissinger, failed to play China against the Soviet Union. 

Pages


The Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict strives to reaffirm the Hoover Institution's dedication to historical research in light of contemporary challenges, and in particular, reinvigorating the national study of military history as an asset to foster and enhance our national security. Read more.

Is there a military solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Stay Up To Date!

Be notified when an new issue is available.

Subscriptions »

RSS Feed Subscription

subscribe and listen on iTunes

Strategika is an online journal that analyzes ongoing issues of national security in light of conflicts of the past—the efforts of the Military History Working Group of historians, analysts, and military personnel focusing on military history and contemporary conflict.

Our board of scholars shares no ideological consensus other than a general acknowledgment that human nature is largely unchanging. Consequently, the study of past wars can offer us tragic guidance about present conflicts—a preferable approach to the more popular therapeutic assumption that contemporary efforts to ensure the perfectibility of mankind eventually will lead to eternal peace. New technologies, methodologies, and protocols come and go; the larger tactical and strategic assumptions that guide them remain mostly the same—a fact discernable only through the study of history.

To stay up to date when new issues are released, sign up here to be notified when a new Strategika is available.

Subscriptions »

 

The opinions expressed in Strategika are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.