Strategika

Subscribe to receive Strategika. Subscribe »

Friday, September 24, 2021

Issue 75

America After Afghanistan
Background Essay
Background Essay

Our Revels Now Are Ended

by Ralph Petersvia Strategika
Friday, September 24, 2021

It’s hard to win a war when you refuse to understand your enemy. It’s harder still when you cannot realistically define your strategic mission. You lame yourself further when you reduce a complex history to a single inaccurate cliché; i.e., “Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires.”

Featured Commentary
Featured Commentary

Afghanistan Post-Mortem

by Peter R. Mansoorvia Strategika
Friday, September 24, 2021

The United States has lost its longest war. After twenty years of conflict and nation building in Afghanistan, the U.S.-backed Afghan regime collapsed like a house of cards in just a few weeks after the announced departure of American and NATO troops from the country. A final flurry of activity by the U.S. military managed to rescue 123,000 people from Kabul, but as Winston Churchill once said of Dunkirk, “Wars are not won by evacuations.”

Featured Commentary

Dented, Not Damaged: The American Empire After Afghanistan

by Josef Joffevia Strategika
Friday, September 24, 2021

When small, even middle-sized powers make grievous mistakes like fighting a losing war or ignoring deadly threats, they risk their place in the global hierarchy or, worse, their existence. Thus did France and Britain when they failed to fight Nazi Germany in the Thirties while still in position of strategic superiority. 

E.g., 12 / 3 / 2021
E.g., 12 / 3 / 2021

No issues were found in that date range. Please expand your range and try again.

Pages

Explore Research

Filter By:

Topic

Type

Author

Section

Enter comma-separated IDs of authors
Enter comma-separated IDs of contributors

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

Hoover Institution Archives Poster Collection: IR 54
Background Essay

Nukes: Why is Iran different?

by Edward N. Luttwak via Strategika
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Hoover Institution Archives Poster Collection: IR 54
Featured Commentary

Sanctions and Iran

by Williamson Murrayvia Strategika
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Hoover Institution Archives Poster Collection: IR 54
Featured Commentary

Iran: Bad Outcomes, and Worse

by Ralph Petersvia Strategika
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Related Commentary

The Iranian nuclear threat

by Victor Davis Hansonvia Strategika
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Related Commentary

The Wrong Reasons for Bombing Syria

by Bruce Thorntonvia Strategika
Monday, April 1, 2013
Related Commentary

Syria and American strategy

by Thomas Donnellyvia Strategika
Monday, April 1, 2013
Related Commentary

An Argument for Containment

by Kiron K. Skinnervia Strategika
Monday, April 1, 2013
Hoover Archives Poster collection: UK 3297, Britain's Land Offensive, Syria, The
Featured Commentary

The Smart and Right Thing in Syria

by Kimberly Kaganvia Strategika
Monday, April 1, 2013
Related Commentary

The Syrian Dilemma

by Victor Davis Hansonvia Strategika
Monday, April 1, 2013
Hoover Archives Poster collection: UK 3297, Britain's Land Offensive, Syria, The
Background Essay

U.S. Interests in Syria, Past and Present

by Mark Moyarvia Strategika
Monday, April 1, 2013

Pages


The Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict strives to reaffirm the Hoover Institution's dedication to historical research in light of contemporary challenges, and in particular, reinvigorating the national study of military history as an asset to foster and enhance our national security. Read more.

Is there a military solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Stay Up To Date!

Be notified when an new issue is available.

Subscriptions »

RSS Feed Subscription

subscribe and listen on iTunes

Strategika is an online journal that analyzes ongoing issues of national security in light of conflicts of the past—the efforts of the Military History Working Group of historians, analysts, and military personnel focusing on military history and contemporary conflict.

Our board of scholars shares no ideological consensus other than a general acknowledgment that human nature is largely unchanging. Consequently, the study of past wars can offer us tragic guidance about present conflicts—a preferable approach to the more popular therapeutic assumption that contemporary efforts to ensure the perfectibility of mankind eventually will lead to eternal peace. New technologies, methodologies, and protocols come and go; the larger tactical and strategic assumptions that guide them remain mostly the same—a fact discernable only through the study of history.

To stay up to date when new issues are released, sign up here to be notified when a new Strategika is available.

Subscriptions »

 

The opinions expressed in Strategika are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.