Filter By:

Subtopic

Type

Fellow

Research Team

Use comma-separated ID numbers for each author

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

Party Affairs

Hu Jintao and the Central Party Apparatus

by Alice L. Millervia China Leadership Monitor
Saturday, July 30, 2005

Nearly three years into his tenure as the top leader of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Hu Jintao has yet to make substantial progress in consolidating his power over the key organs of the central party apparatus. Hu's predecessor Jiang Zemin also moved cautiously and with limited success to place political subordinates into these posts at a comparable point in his tenure. Soon after consolidating his position at the top of the PRC political order, however, Jiang moved more quickly to promote his associates in the central party apparatus. Now that Hu has completed a comparable transition, he may move more assertively to do the same, especially as 2007 approaches, bringing with it the 17th Party Congress.

Cowboys and Indians

by Niall Fergusonvia Hoover Digest
Saturday, July 30, 2005

Want the American troops out of Iraq now? Be careful what you wish for. By Niall Ferguson.

To Preserve and Protect

by Lee Edwardsvia Hoover Digest
Saturday, July 30, 2005

“If Ed Meese is not a good man,” Ronald Reagan once said, “there are no good men.” A profile of a good man. By Lee Edwards.

The Democracy Problem

by William Ratliffvia Hoover Digest
Saturday, July 30, 2005

In Latin America these days, democracy isn’t working very well. Indeed, it almost never has. Why? By William Ratliff.

Why We Must Stay

by Victor Davis Hansonvia Hoover Digest
Saturday, July 30, 2005

Why the war in Iraq is not like the war in Vietnam—and why the present conflict must not be permitted to end the way the former conflict ended. By Victor Davis Hanson.

Military Affairs

They Protest Too Much (Or Too Little), Methinks: Soldier Protests, Party Control of the Military, and the "National Army" Debate

by James Mulvenonvia China Leadership Monitor
Saturday, July 30, 2005

Protests by retired soldiers—coupled with stern internal propaganda campaigns aimed at reinforcing military loyalty and denouncing talk of a "national army"—suggest cracks in the façade of Chinese party-army unity. This article analyzes recent civil-military developments in China, and assesses their implications.

Why We Lacked Resilience

by Henry I. Millervia Hoover Digest
Saturday, July 30, 2005

How could one storm score a hit on every wallet in the country? By Henry I. Miller.

Economic Policy

Incremental Decision Making and Corporate Restructuring

by Barry Naughtonvia China Leadership Monitor
Saturday, July 30, 2005

Economic and business stories have dominated Western press attention to China in 2005, perhaps more so than in any previous year. Perceptions of a dynamic "rising China" have burst into American consciousness in an unprecedented fashion. Ironically, however, leadership decision making on economic policy in China seems to be sliding back toward a more bureaucratically dominated and less imaginative pattern. From a policymaking standpoint, there has been little significant innovation during 2005. This article reviews developments in four areas: currency revaluation, share conversion, consolidation of firms, and the new industrial policy for the steel industry. Taken together, the trends in these areas suggest a move toward cautious, incremental, and bureaucrat-dominated policymaking as well as an effort to step up the pace of corporate restructuring.

A Million-Dollar Affair

by William F. Buckley Jr.via Hoover Digest
Saturday, July 30, 2005

A tribute to Milton Friedman. By William F. Buckley Jr.

Lincoln in His Own Words

by Daniel Sullivanvia Policy Review
Wednesday, June 1, 2005

Daniel Sullivan on The Eloquent President: A Portrait of Lincoln Through His Words by Ronald C. White

Pages

Military History Working Group


The Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict examines how knowledge of past military operations can influence contemporary public policy decisions concerning current conflicts.