Published: March 13, 2019

America’s immigration system needs to be reformed in order to handle modern challenges of immigration. Long lines to get in exist alongside millions of undocumented immigrants already in the country. To deal with both of these problems, Congress should rebalance our system to encourage more work-based visas for those wanting to work in the US, and it should bring illegal immigrants back into the system through a special visa that puts them at the back of the line for permanent residency. 

Discussion Questions

Additional Resources

  • Read “An Immigration Game Plan for the New Congress,” by Edward Lazear in the Wall Street Journal, available here.
  • Read “Send Us Your Young, Your Educated” by Edward Lazear in the Wall Street Journal, available here
  • In “Examining America’s Exceptional Economy,” Edward Lazear explores what has made America's economy successful, what sets it apart from other nations, and what needs to be done to sustain its prominence in the global economy. Available here.

Most people think America’s immigration system is broken. There are long lines to get in AND there are millions of undocumented immigrants already living in the country.

So what can Congress do to make our immigration system more sensible?

Most immigrants who receive green cards get them because someone in their family is already a resident of the US. Family ties are important, but shouldn’t trump all other priorities, like helping to fill excessive vacancies in the labor market.

More slots should be allocated on the basis of our country’s occupational needs. The easiest way to determine which industries and occupations are experiencing labor shortages is to identify those with rapid wage growth. When labor demand rises relative to supply, wages go up. Green-card limits could be adjusted periodically to reflect labor-market conditions.

Many might worry that more immigrant labor means reduced wages for native-born workers. Several studies over the years demonstrate that this is not the case. 

It is true that some are affected by competition for jobs from new immigrants. But even for them, the effects are minimal.

One study on the massive Soviet migration to Israel revealed that immigration had at most small effects on the wages of the native-born.

Another provides evidence that immigrants have negligible effects on the wages of those already in the country.

And if there is any impact, it is primarily on immigrants who arrived earlier. Using labor-market data to determine labor-market tightness will help us assure that existing workers aren’t negatively impacted. So what about the eleven million or so undocumented immigrants already in the country?

Most Americans accept that those who have entered illegally or overstayed their visas have committed a crime. Complete amnesty seems inappropriate and would encourage illegal entry in the future. As an alternative to deportation, however, one reasonable approach would be to fine undocumented immigrants rather than deport them.

Congress should create a “Z” visa, to be issued to undocumented immigrants who can demonstrate that on the day the bill is signed, they have been in the U.S. for say, three years or more and have no criminal record. The visa would allow them, their spouses and children to stay, provided that they pay an annual visa fee of, say, a few hundred dollars. Anyone with a “Z” visa could continue working while applying for a green card and paying the annual fee, but they would have to go to the back of the line, as would be the case if they were applying from their origin country. This approach neither favors nor penalizes them on their path for citizenship.

In order to discourage future illegal immigration, Congress should create appropriate incentives to apply for legal status. Employer enforcement is essential to ensure that the undocumented do not choose to stay in the shadows rather than pay the fee for a “Z” visa. Programs like E-Verify, where firms check if workers have a valid Social Security number, are necessary and should be enhanced. Firms that hire undocumented workers should be fined heavily, but should also be given safe harbor if E-Verify confirms that an applicant is permitted to work in this country. 

A system that penalizes employing those without legal status in the U.S. is also the best way to keep newillegal immigrants out. Immigrants who are unable to find work cannot afford to live and stay in the U.S.

And while border enforcement is necessary and uncontroversial, it is insufficient because nearly half of all illegal immigrants in the U.S. entered the country legally and then overstayed their visas.

Creating a system of more balanced immigration, introducing a Z visa to deal with the current population of undocumented immigrants, and adopting measures to discourage illegal entry in the future would significantly improve our immigration system. 

Related

VIDEO

Should We Regulate AI (Before It's Too Late)?

Artificial intelligence could become one of the most consequential drivers of productivity and economic growth in a generation. Yet concerns about job displacement, misinformation, and political disruption have prompted calls to regulate the technology before its effects are fully understood. History shows that major innovations disrupt existing industries while creating new forms of work and enterprise that policymakers rarely anticipate. Premature regulation risks entrenching established firms, limiting competition, and expanding government influence over information. The challenge is to address genuine harms while preserving the freedom and experimentation that allow innovation to advance.

Videos

Incentives Are For Losers Featuring Adam Mastroianni

Adam Mastroianni and Russ Roberts explore what it takes to do the right thing when the incentives point the other way.

September 14, 2026

VIDEO

Is Minimum Wage A Dead End?

Minimum wage policy is intended to increase earnings for low-wage workers and reduce poverty. Evidence from state-level increases, however, shows that businesses may respond by changing how many people they employ, how many hours they offer, whom they hire, and how much work they automate. Workers who remain employed may earn more per hour, but others may lose income or job opportunities, while many of those who benefit do not live in poor households. The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) directs support toward low-income working families without putting other workers’ jobs or hours at risk.