Hamas And The Future Of Gaza Featuring Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib

He lost his childhood homes, dozens of family members, and most of his hearing in his left ear to Israeli bombs, yet Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib insists that Palestinians must also take responsibility for Gaza's destruction and for peace. Most Gazans, he insists, have turned against Hamas for oppressing them, enriching itself, and bringing catastrophe to Gaza in the aftermath of October 7th. Alkhatib calls for Palestinian introspection and agency while also faulting Israel's settlement expansion and its undermining of moderates. He envisions a demilitarized Gaza run by nonpartisan technocrats, a Palestinian identity defined by aspiration rather than opposition, and direct Israeli-Palestinian dialogue—starting with a "Great Reset" of 100 days without violence on either side. EconTalk host Russ Roberts, more skeptical that Hamas will ever truly disarm, shares Alkhatib's hope that the two peoples might one day live as peaceful neighbors.

Listen to the episode here.

ABOUT THE SPEAKER

Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib leads Realign For Palestine, an Atlantic Council project that challenges entrenched narratives in the Israel and Palestine discourse and develops a new policy framework for rejuvenated pro-Palestine advocacy. Realign For Palestine aims to cultivate a new generation of Palestinian voices committed to a two-nation solution, nonviolence, and radical pragmatism. His writing and opinions have been published and featured across the US, Israeli, and international press, and his views are prominently featured across social media platforms. He grew up in Gaza City and left Gaza in 2005.

RELATED SOURCES

Cast

Russ Roberts

Russ Roberts

Related

Articles

A Network Approach To Geopolitics

In international affairs, what a country does depends on its own interests and on what its partners do. This column uses data on political institutions and UN voting to recover the network of geopolitical influence. The network tracks major shifts in international politics since the 1960s and reveals three notions of power: autonomy, control, and the ability to shape the game. Across all countries, the US has the most autonomy but China has the most control. Domestic political change in the US or China moves other countries the most, as the network transmits it furthest.

November 3, 2026

Articles

‘Messy And Complicated’: Scholars Expect Long Standoff In Deadlocked Israel Election

Hoover Institution fellows weighed in: Russell Berman called the turnout “far beyond what we see in the US.” Larry Diamond noted that the election posed challenges for Netanyahu’s coalition, which he said held 61 seats before the vote but won only 53. “Avoiding another round of elections will require creativity, compromise, and focus on the national interest,” Peter Berkowitz wrote.

October 22, 2026

Videos

China’s Anxieties in Latin America

Despite China's growing economic influence in Latin America, Beijing faces challenges it cannot easily control, from the activities of Chinese nationals abroad to costly missteps by its companies. These vulnerabilities reveal an overlooked opportunity for the United States to strengthen its position in the region through diplomacy, security cooperation, and deeper knowledge of China.

October 26, 2026