Published: January 9, 2020

America’s founders understood that the persistent and historical threat to freedom is the concentration of power, especially in the hands of the government. They wrote America’s Constitution in a manner that preserves individual freedom by limiting the government’s power. But too many people in modern times have forgotten the risk involved in giving the government more power and control over their lives.

Discussion Questions:

  1. Is the federal government’s power benevolent, malevolent, or a mix of both?
  2. What is the difference between negative and positive rights, and how does that relate to the powers granted to the government?

Additional resources:

  • Watch “How to Stay Free” with Milton Friedman, available here.
  • Read “The Perils of Executive Power” by Richard Epstein, available here.
  • Read “Isaiah Berlin’s Many-Sided Concept of Liberty” by Peter Berkowitz, available here.

Cast

Milton Friedman

Milton Friedman

Related

VIDEO

Should We Regulate AI (Before It's Too Late)?

Artificial intelligence could become one of the most consequential drivers of productivity and economic growth in a generation. Yet concerns about job displacement, misinformation, and political disruption have prompted calls to regulate the technology before its effects are fully understood. History shows that major innovations disrupt existing industries while creating new forms of work and enterprise that policymakers rarely anticipate. Premature regulation risks entrenching established firms, limiting competition, and expanding government influence over information. The challenge is to address genuine harms while preserving the freedom and experimentation that allow innovation to advance.

Videos

Incentives Are For Losers Featuring Adam Mastroianni

Adam Mastroianni and Russ Roberts explore what it takes to do the right thing when the incentives point the other way.

September 14, 2026

VIDEO

Is Minimum Wage A Dead End?

Minimum wage policy is intended to increase earnings for low-wage workers and reduce poverty. Evidence from state-level increases, however, shows that businesses may respond by changing how many people they employ, how many hours they offer, whom they hire, and how much work they automate. Workers who remain employed may earn more per hour, but others may lose income or job opportunities, while many of those who benefit do not live in poor households. The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) directs support toward low-income working families without putting other workers’ jobs or hours at risk.