How the Constitution Prevents Socialism

In countries that have adopted socialism, governments inevitably infringe on the people’s liberties. 

Despite this checkered history, many -- particularly young Americans -- think socialism would be good for America. 

Fortunately, the U.S. Constitution makes it difficult to enact genuine socialist policy. 

Socialism demands the centralization of government power and the supremacy of the state over the individual. 

The framers of our Constitution sought to prevent exactly this. 

They understood that centralizing power threatened individual liberty; they purposely set up a system to prevent it. 

The Framers established a federal government of limited, enumerated powers, with most authority remaining with the states. 

Even within Washington, D.C., the Constitution would further break up the government with a separation of powers that would check and balance each branch of government. 

For socialism to prevail, it would have to eliminate these restrictions. 

Over the past century, the federal government has expanded its power at the expense of the states through expansive interpretations of its commerce and spending powers. 

While these actions have weakened the framers’ design, federalism resists the concentration of government. 

Maintaining and strengthening the balance between states and the federal government will ensure that socialism will fail, power will remain dispersed, and our liberties will flourish.