Hoover InstitutionStanford University
National Emergencies Do Not Expand Constitutional Power

Published August 27, 2020

During national emergencies, it is common for Congress and the presidency to increase their authority. However, the US Constitution sets certain limits on federal powers in order to protect the rights of individuals and states. These constitutional limitations prevent temporary violations from becoming permanent and keep leaders from cultivating emergencies in order to expand their authority.

Discussion Questions:

  1. What are some examples of the federal government trying to expand its powers in times of emergency?
  2. What are the benefits of a federalist system (especially in times of national emergency)?

Additional Resources:

  • Read “Emergencies Do Not Expand Constitutional Power,” by Clint Bolick via Defining Ideas. Available here.
  • Read “Federalism Rediscovered,” by Clint Bolick via Defining Ideas. Available here.
  • Read “Federalism: The Grand Design,” by Clint Bolick. Available here.

Cast

Clint Bolick

Clint Bolick

Related

Articles

Foundation For Individual Rights And Expression Cases (2025-26) And Their Ideological Valence

FIRE has billed itself as a nonpartisan organization that fights speech restrictions that are seen as left-wing, right-wing, and no-wing. Some have, however, argued that FIRE mostly fights left-wing restrictions (and thus mostly protects right-wing speakers), and goes after only a few right-wing restrictions as supposed "tokens" to hide its true nature.

October 28, 2026

Videos

The History Of Macroeconomics From Keynes To HANK Models

Greg Kaplan on the history of macroeconomic theory from Keynesian to Heterogeneous Agent New Keynesian Models, Bob Hall and Michael Woodford’s Nobel Prize, and his contributions to modeling heterogeneous agents. 

October 29, 2026

Articles

Beware Of Five Tricks In Policy Debates

Move past the short cuts and the social media noise, and fuller pictures emerge.

October 27, 2026