Should Speech That Offends Be Prohibited?

Published: May 1, 2017

Speech that attempts to persuade is broadly protected under free speech, even if some people find it offensive. What some find offensive, others may find persuasive. A commitment to free speech inevitably means protecting the rights of people whose speech is deeply offensive to many, but a permissive environment leads to fewer rights being violated and ultimately, a freer world.

Discussion Questions

  1. Are there any circumstances in which offensive speech is prohibited?
  2. Can you counteract offensive speech through persuasive speech?
  3. Allowing offensive speech means some people who hold views that are widely offensive will be allowed to speak. What are the benefits of a system that protects groups like that? What are the costs?

Cast

Richard A. Epstein

Richard A. Epstein

Related

Articles

The Presidential Seal Of Disapproval

Demonizing Donald Trump is a recurring theme in the closing arguments for California ballot initiatives. That’s even true of one measure making permanent a “temporary” state tax increase that has nothing to do with the president—but says plenty about the Golden State’s fiscal house of cards.    

October 22, 2026

Articles

After The Blue Wave

Why we still need democratic reform.

October 21, 2026

Articles

United CEO’s Wealth Tax Would Hit His Own Shareholders

Scott Kirby wants a national wealth tax and inheritance taxes near 100%. Among those who would pay are the investors he ultimately works for.

October 20, 2026