Videos
Lanhee Chen: Meet The Press
(30:25) Hoover Institution fellow Lanhee Chen joins a panel discussing the midterm elections.
August 30, 2026
Eugene Volokh and Jane Bambauer examine the groundbreaking Robby Starbuck v. Google case, one of the first major defamation lawsuits arising from generative AI "hallucinations." They explore whether AI-generated falsehoods can constitute libel, why Section 230 offers no protection for AI-generated content, and how traditional defamation law applies when an AI invents damaging allegations about a real person. The conversation also covers the legal standards for actual malice, the role of discovery, Delaware's unusually permissive pleading rules, and whether these lawsuits could reshape the future of AI development—or expose AI companies to a wave of costly litigation. If AI can invent facts, who should bear the responsibility? This episode tackles one of the most important legal questions facing artificial intelligence today.
Recorded on July 30, 2026.
More from Free Speech Unmuted
More Like This
Related
Articles
First Amendment Broadly Protects Against Speech-Based Deportation Of Noncitizens, Court Rules
Some short excerpts from the >35K-word decision by Judge Noël Wise (N.D. Cal.) in Stanford Daily Pub. Corp. v. Rubio: Plaintiffs, Stanford Daily Publishing Corporation and Jane Doe, a noncitizen student holding an F-1 visa issued by the United States, bring their claims against Marco Rubio, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, and Markwayne Mullin, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security ….
August 29, 2026
Videos
The Process Is The Punishment: ABC v. FCC With Stuart Benjamin
Eugene Volokh, Jane Bambauer, and Stuart Benjamin discuss ABC’s lawsuit against the FCC and whether the agency’s recent use of its regulatory power to target certain kinds of content is unconstitutional.
September 1, 2026 • 0 Min Watch