Big Tech and Free Speech

Published November 2, 2021

Are internet companies such as Facebook and YouTube allowed to censor the content on their websites? Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, these companies are not held liable for user-uploaded speech, allowing them to determine who to ban or restrict from their platforms. Removing this protection would only make matters worse, as it would put the responsibility for determining who and what to censor in the hands of the government. Further regulating Big Tech comes with unexpected dangers that may do more harm than good.

Discussion Questions:

  1. What is regulatory capture, and why is it important to avoid?
  2. Should Big Tech companies be considered monopolies? Why or why not?

Additional Resources:

  • Watch “Trump’s Facebook Time-Out.” an episode of Matters of Policy and Politics with John Yoo and Bill Whalen. Available here.
  • Watch “The Danger of Regulatory Capture,” on PolicyEd. Available here.
  • Read “Who Can Restrict Free Speech?” on PolicyEd. Available here.

Cast

John Yoo

John Yoo

Related

Articles

The Presidential Seal Of Disapproval

Demonizing Donald Trump is a recurring theme in the closing arguments for California ballot initiatives. That’s even true of one measure making permanent a “temporary” state tax increase that has nothing to do with the president—but says plenty about the Golden State’s fiscal house of cards.    

October 22, 2026

Articles

After The Blue Wave

Why we still need democratic reform.

October 21, 2026

Articles

United CEO’s Wealth Tax Would Hit His Own Shareholders

Scott Kirby wants a national wealth tax and inheritance taxes near 100%. Among those who would pay are the investors he ultimately works for.

October 20, 2026