The Enduring Failures of Rent Control

Published April 16, 2026

Rent control is presented as a way to make housing more affordable, but it does the opposite. By holding rents below market levels, it reduces supply, discourages maintenance, and weakens incentives for new construction. The result is fewer available units, lower housing quality, and a market that works less well for those trying to enter it. Its political durability is part of the problem. Rent control protects incumbent tenants while outsiders face a tighter supply, lower vacancy rates, and a harder search. By contrast, gasoline price controls in the 1970s were easier to repeal because the costs were visible and broadly shared. Rent control persists because its benefits are concentrated among those already inside the system, while the costs fall on those still trying to get in.

Learn more from David R. Henderson:

  • Read "Rent Control Creates Privileged Tenants" by David Henderson here.
  • Read "Phil Gramm and Donald Boudreaux, Economic Myth-Busters" by David Henderson here.
  • Read "The Economics of Oil Prices" by David Henderson here.

Learn more about David R. Henderson here.

__________

The opinions expressed in this video are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.

© 2026 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University.

 

 

Related

Articles

Data Center Siting And Community Opposition

Where data centers locate to fuel the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) is of burgeoning political importance with economic and environmental implications. We highlight local factors associated with siting and opposition.

November 3, 2026

Event

Money and Power: Historical Lessons for Stablecoins and U.S Dollar Dominance

The Hoover Institution Economic Policy Working Group hosted “Money and Power: Historical Lessons for Stablecoins and U.S Dollar Dominance” with Michael D. Bordo, the Duncan Stewart Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution.

April 23, 2026

Articles

We Just Created More Than 1,000 Synthetic Controls To Study California's $20 Fast Food Minimum Wage

Synthetic control methods hold the promise of identifying a credible counterfactual by closely reproducing pretreatment outcome paths. Their reliability, however, depends in part on how effectively they constrain researchers’ less-visible degrees of freedom. We explore these methods’ sensitivity by constructing 1440 plausibly defensible specifications to estimate the employment effect of California’s $20 fast-food minimum wage. While over 96 percent of the estimated employment effects are negative, the range is vast, illustrating that synthetic control methods are sensitive to specification choice.

October 30, 2026