A Misalignment of Interests: The Politics of Pension Funding

Published: October 12, 2017

The unfunded obligations of pensions systems sponsored by state and local governments continue to grow as a result of unrealistic assumptions about investment returns in pension funds. States that say they’re running balanced budgets are concealing growing debt that crowds out much needed services and imposes higher taxes on current and future taxpayers.

Be sure to read “Hidden Debt, Hidden Deficits: 2017 Edition,”  in which Joshua D. Rauh details the issues surrounding the pension system and the role of governments in increasing liabilities and deficits by means of their pension system.

Discussion Questions

  1. How can we discourage state politicians from underfunding pensions funds appropriately and making risky investments?
  2. Is there a way to ensure that state politicians use tax money responsibly to meet pension commitments?
  3. Why would state politicians make risky investments if they know that they could lose more money?

Cast

Joshua D. Rauh

Joshua D. Rauh

Related

Videos

Industrial Policy: The Case Of Shipbuilding

The United States produces very few ships. China produces many. Why?

November 11, 2026

Articles

Is Workers’ Compensation Keeping Pace?

Use the proper benchmark to explore questions of what’s fair.

November 10, 2026

Essays

Limiting Federal Spending Growth to Balance the Budget

Many think that balancing the federal budget would require deep cuts in entitlement programs. This paper shows to the contrary that the budget can be balanced within 15 years through modest and sustained federal spending restraint and moderately higher economic growth. Key to this restraint is to limit the growth in the average future value of entitlement benefits per recipient to today’s level, after adjusting for inflation and rising healthcare costs. 

November 10, 2026