Eugene Volokh and Jane Bambauer examine the groundbreaking Robby Starbuck v. Google case, one of the first major defamation lawsuits arising from generative AI "hallucinations." They explore whether AI-generated falsehoods can constitute libel, why Section 230 offers no protection for AI-generated content, and how traditional defamation law applies when an AI invents damaging allegations about a real person. The conversation also covers the legal standards for actual malice, the role of discovery, Delaware's unusually permissive pleading rules, and whether these lawsuits could reshape the future of AI development—or expose AI companies to a wave of costly litigation. If AI can invent facts, who should bear the responsibility? This episode tackles one of the most important legal questions facing artificial intelligence today.
Recorded on July 30, 2026.
Videos
Hoover Institution fellow Sean Westwood sounds the alarm after an AI bot he programmed was able to fool online surveys into thinking it was a human respondent. Westwood says or 75 years, the problem with polls was that they sometimes got human opinion wrong. The problem now is that they may not involve humans at all.
September 3, 2026
Videos
Ian Rowe explains how Thomas Sowell’s uncompromising pursuit of truth inspires students to reject victimhood and become architects of their own lives.
September 8, 2026
Videos
Historian Andrew Roberts joins Peter Robinson to defend Winston Churchill’s legacy and explore how great leaders, historical memory, and the lessons of the past can guide a troubled West.
September 8, 2026 • 0 Min Watch
