When can a public university punish a student for speech that includes violent references, and that frightens some people, but is not a clear threat? Eugene Volokh and Jane Bambauer unpack two recent court cases, one that upholds such punishment and another that says it violates the First Amendment:  Damsky v. University of Florida and Christensen v. Ohio State University. Volokh and Bambauer explore how courts are applying the “substantial disruption” standard from Tinker v. Des Moines, and why speech by public university students that alludes in an ambiguous way to violence creates hard First Amendment questions.

Recorded on January 28, 2026.

Cast

Eugene Volokh

Eugene Volokh

Related

Videos

Professor Sean Westwood Explains How AI Bots Are Faking Human Responses In Online Surveys

Hoover Institution fellow Sean Westwood sounds the alarm after an AI bot he programmed was able to fool online surveys into thinking it was a human respondent. Westwood says or 75 years, the problem with polls was that they sometimes got human opinion wrong. The problem now is that they may not involve humans at all.

September 3, 2026

Videos

How Thomas Sowell Thankfully Made Me A Contrarian Educator

Ian Rowe explains how Thomas Sowell’s uncompromising pursuit of truth inspires students to reject victimhood and become architects of their own lives.

September 8, 2026

Videos

Why Churchill Still Matters: Andrew Roberts On Great Men in History

Historian Andrew Roberts joins Peter Robinson to defend Winston Churchill’s legacy and explore how great leaders, historical memory, and the lessons of the past can guide a troubled West.

September 8, 2026 • 0 Min Watch