David Brady

Davies Family Senior Fellow
Research Team: 
Virtues Task Force (inactive)Chairman
Awards and Honors:
American Academy of Arts and Sciences

David Brady holds the Bowen H. and Janice Arthur McCoy Professor of Political Science in the Stanford Graduate School of Business and is the Davies Family Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution.  He has published seven books and more than a hundred papers in journals and books.  Among his most recent books are Leadership and Growth (World Bank Publications, 2010) with Michael Spence, Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Bush II (Westview Press, 2006), and Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics with Pietro Nivola (Brookings Institution Press, 2007).  His recent articles include “Why Is Health Care Reform So Difficult?” with Daniel Kessler, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, April 2010; “Putting the Public’s Money Where Its Mouth Is”  with Daniel Kessler, Health Affairs: The Policy Journal of the Health Sphere, August 2009, pages 917–25; “Leadership and Politics: A Perspective from the Growth Commission,” with Michael Spence, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25, no. 2 (2009): 205–18; “The 2010 Elections: Why Did Political Science Forecasts Go Awry?” with Morris P. Fiorina and Arjun Wilkins, 2011.

Brady has been on continual appointment at Stanford University since 1986, where he has served as associate dean for Academic Affairs in the Graduate School of Business (GSB) and as vice provost for Distance Learning.  He has twice been a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1987.  He presently holds the Bowen H. and Janice Arthur McCoy Professorship in Ethics at the Business School and was deputy director of the Hoover Institution from 2004-2014.

During his teaching career, he won the Dinkelspiel Award for service to undergraduates, the Richard Lyman Prize for service to alumni, the Bob Davies Award and the Jaedicke Silver Cup from the GSB, and the first Phi Beta Kappa Teaching Award given at Stanford.  He also won the George Brown Teaching Award at Rice University.

Filter By:



Recent Commentary

In Perspective: Decision 2016 - Poll Position
Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured

Poll Position: Debates Effects On The Polls

by David Brady, Douglas Rivers, Bill Whalenvia In Perspective: Decision 2016
Thursday, October 6, 2016

The 2016 Presidential Election.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured

Will The Undecided Decide The Election?

by David Bradyvia Defining Ideas
Monday, September 19, 2016

Clinton and Trump battle it out for voters who have turned their backs on them.

FeaturedBlank Section (Placeholder)

Party Identification Shift May Hobble Trump

by David Brady, Carl Cannonvia Real Clear Politics
Thursday, September 15, 2016

Barack Obama won re-election four years ago largely because the 2012 electorate had more Democrats than Republicans—and because the president held serve with his fellow Democrats. In one sense, the story of the 2016 election can be distilled into a single question: Can Hillary Clinton do likewise?

FeaturedBlank Section (Placeholder)

Making Sense Of The 2016 Election

by Morris P. Fiorina, David Brady, Douglas Rivers, Bill Whalenvia Stanford News
Monday, September 12, 2016

A few Stanford political experts are gathering in cyberspace to help people make sense of the 2016 election.

FeaturedBlank Section (Placeholder)

Can Undecideds Help Trump Win The Election?

by David Brady, Douglas Riversvia Real Clear Politics
Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Going into September, Hillary Clinton has a sizable advantage over Donald Trump: five percentage points in the RealClearPolitics’ polling average. The Upshot, the New York Times’ polling blog, gives Clinton a 90 percent chance of winning the presidency, while British Sky Bet gives Clinton four times as good a chance as Trump.

FeaturedBlank Section (Placeholder)

Westminster, D.C.?

by David Bradyvia Commentary
Thursday, August 11, 2016

No, the United States does not need a prime minister.

Blank Section (Placeholder)

Trade Winds

by David Bradyvia Hoover Digest
Monday, July 11, 2016

Globalization is buffeting states as never before. The stable systems will be those that best handle rapid economic change.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured

The Shrinking Predictive Power Of Economic Growth Models

by David Brady, Douglas Riversvia In Perspective: Decision 2016
Friday, July 8, 2016

Now that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have all but secured their parties’ nominations, what is the best way to look at how their 2016 matchup is most likely to turn out?

FeaturedBlank Section (Placeholder)

Orlando Shooting, Sanders Staying In: How They Affect Polls

by Carl Cannon, David Bradyvia Real Clear Politics
Monday, June 27, 2016

Are candidates more important than the issues in 2016—or is the other way around? A new survey by YouGov unearths evidence for both hypotheses, while providing intriguing hints about the mood of the 2016 electorate.

Blank Section (Placeholder)

Stuck in the Middle

by David Bradyvia Hoover Digest
Monday, April 18, 2016

It’s the independents, not the true believers, who make or break a candidate. And they don’t think all that much of Donald Trump.