Military History/Contemporary Conflict Working Group

Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict

Explore Research

Filter By:

Topic

Type

Author

Enter comma-separated ID numbers for authors
Related Commentary

Boots Necessary to Reboot Our Influence

by Bing West via Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

America has only one commander-in-chief at a time.

Related Commentary

Rebooting the U.S.’s Middle East Policy

by Barry Strauss via Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

To reboot its policy in the Middle East, the United States need not follow any sophisticated programs or up-to-date ideas. It needs only to act according to a rule as old as the Greeks and Romans: help your friends and hurt your enemies.

Related Commentary

Too Many Questions and Too Much Doubt

by Kori Schakevia Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

That fine strategist Groucho Marx said that in politics, authenticity is everything; once you can fake that, you’ve got it made.

Related Commentary

Point the Way Out of the Hole

by Walter Russell Mead via Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

The first step for the United States in the Middle East is to observe the First Rule of Holes: stop digging. The pursuit of a nuclear understanding with Iran without simultaneously acting to constrain Iran’s effort to dominate the region has destabilized the Sunni world, undermined key American alliances, and contributed to the rise of ISIS and related groups.

Related Commentary

Five Points for Success in the Middle East

by Thomas Donnellyvia Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

To reestablish a favorable balance of power across the Greater Middle East—the region stretching from the northwest coast of Africa through the Arab lands of the Levant and Persian Gulf into South Asia—the United States must first be clear about its geopolitical goals.

Featured Commentary

Know the Enemy and the Nature of the Conflict We Face

by Colonel Joseph (Joe) Felter (ret.)via Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

An important first step in rebooting U.S. Middle East policy and more effectively addressing the roots of the problems that have manifested into threats to U.S. and international security demands that we more holistically embrace Sun Tzu’s maxim of the importance of knowing one’s enemy.

Featured Commentary

The U.S. Must Turn Over Its Upside-Down Foreign Policy

by Kimberly Kaganvia Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

The United States does not have an image problem in the Middle East. It has a reality problem. The United States has lost credibility in the Middle East by abandoning its friends and reaching out to its enemies.

Background Essay

Time to Combat the Spreading Virus of Radical Islam

by Joshua Muravchik via Strategika
Friday, December 19, 2014

America’s clout in the Middle East is waning, but this is not the fruit of an inexorable process divorced from human will. Rather it reflects aggressive bids by other actors—Iran, Russia, Turkey, and a variety of Islamist factions—to enhance their power at the same time that America has pursued a policy of lowering its profile and shrinking its footprint.

an image
Featured Commentary

Are Drone Strikes More Defensible Than Torture?

by Victor Davis Hansonvia Tribune Media Services
Wednesday, December 17, 2014

There are lots of hypocrisies surrounding the recently released executive summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on the CIA's detention and interrogation program. 

Interviews

Kori Schake on the John Batchelor Show (20:25)

interview with Kori Schakevia John Batchelor Show
Thursday, December 11, 2014

Research Fellow Kori Schake discusses the recent Senate report on interrogation on the John Batchelor Show.

Pages

From left to right: Bing West, Peter Mansoor, Ralph Peters, Victor Davis Hanson

Military History Working Group meets at Hoover

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

The Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict met for a workshop during October 7 and 8 to chart its long-term objectives and review its new online journal, Strategika.

News

The Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict examines how knowledge of past military operations can influence contemporary public policy decisions concerning current conflicts. 


As the very name of Hoover Institution attests, military history lies at the very core of our dedication to the study of "War, Revolution, and Peace." Indeed, the precise mission statement of the Hoover Institution includes the following promise: "The overall mission of this Institution is, from its records, to recall the voice of experience against the making of war, and by the study of these records and their publication, to recall man's endeavors to make and preserve peace, and to sustain for America the safeguards of the American way of life." From its origins as a library and archive, the Hoover Institution has evolved into one of the foremost research centers in the world for policy formation and pragmatic analysis. It is with this tradition in mind, that the "Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict" has set its agenda—reaffirming the Hoover Institution's dedication to historical research in light of contemporary challenges, and in particular, reinvigorating the national study of military history as an asset to foster and enhance our national security. By bringing together a diverse group of distinguished military historians, security analysts, and military veterans and practitioners, the working group seeks to examine the conflicts of the past as critical lessons for the present.

Victor Davis Hanson on War in the Contemporary World — WATCH

The careful study of military history offers a way of analyzing modern war and peace that is often underappreciated in this age of technological determinism. Yet the result leads to a more in-depth and dispassionate understanding of contemporary wars, one that explains how particular military successes and failures of the past can be often germane, sometimes misunderstood, or occasionally irrelevant in the context of the present.

The working group is chaired by Victor Davis Hanson with counsel from Bruce S. Thornton and David L. Berkey, along with collaboration form the group’s distinguished scholars, military historians, analysts, journalists, and military officers.