Military History/Contemporary Conflict Working Group

Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict

Explore Research

Filter By:




Enter comma-separated ID numbers for authors
Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

Lassitude in the Legislature on Iran

by Thomas Donnellyvia Military History in the News
Thursday, July 23, 2015

Bringing an historical bent to the business of blogging is a temptation to, if not necessarily a manifestation of, schizophrenia. Nonetheless, President Obama’s desire to bypass the Congress in favor of the United Nations in ratifying his Iran deal marks a moment to reflect upon the relationship between legislatures and executives when it comes to making strategy.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

Obama’s Dangerous Rhetoric

by Victor Davis Hansonvia Defining Ideas
Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Our enemies do not believe the president’s hot air, which will only make the world a more dangerous place. 

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

F-35: Highway To The Danger Zone

by Thomas Donnellyvia Military History in the News
Thursday, July 16, 2015

There is something about weapons “testing” that excites all of mankind’s most irrational emotions. The worst example has been the Pentagon’s official test agency, which is—most of the time—dedicated to the proposition that anything can be blown up.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

Javad’s Saga: Epic Poetry And The Iranian Nuclear Deal

by Thomas Donnellyvia Military History in the News
Friday, July 10, 2015

As the denouement of the operatic nuclear negotiations with Iran approaches (although who can be sure about those won’t-get-off-the-stage divas, John Kerry and Javad Zarif), the drama diminishes: Wagnerian epics have loud endings, not plot surprises. It is the job of the libretto to turn the Fat Lady loose.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

Why the Islamic State Is Weathering the Air Campaign

by Peter R. Mansoorvia Military History in the News
Tuesday, June 16, 2015

On June 2, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken told France Inter radio that the U.S.-led air campaign against ISIS had killed 10,000 members in the nine months since the attacks began. This was undoubtedly a salvo in the information campaign against the extremist group, as well as an attempt to downplay the recent loss of Ramadi to the Islamic State.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

Why National Reputation Matters

by Peter R. Mansoorvia Military History in the News
Thursday, June 11, 2015

The multipolar world that has emerged from the brief moment of American unilateralism following the end of the Cold War has pitted the United States against strategic competitors in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Taking advantage of American military and economic weakness, but more importantly acting on a very real perception that American policymakers are no longer capable of providing the leadership required to knit together a global order, Chinese, Russian, and Iranian leaders are busy carving out pieces of neighboring regions.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

The Patriot Act And The History Of American Code Breaking

by Peter R. Mansoorvia Military History in the News
Thursday, June 4, 2015

The uproar over the recent failure of the Senate to renew several key provisions of the Patriot Act highlights the love/hate relationship that Americans have with their intelligence agencies. During periods of heightened international tension, Americans depend on their intelligence agencies to provide accurate forecasting and early warning of pending threats to national security.

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

A Lesson Of Waterloo

by Andrew Robertsvia Military History in the News
Wednesday, May 27, 2015

The bicentenary of the battle of Waterloo—perhaps the most significant battle in European history—is already being celebrated, despite the crescendo not coming until the anniversary itself, Thursday, June 18th. The sheer number of events taking place connected to the commemorations is astonishing, and not just in the victorious countries.

Featured CommentaryRelated Commentary

Where Is NATO’s Military Headed?

by Bing West via Hoover Daily Report
Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Peter Mansoor concluded his overview of NATO by writing, “fear of Russian revanchism has served as inspiration for the maintenance of a healthy military relationship among NATO allies… a pivotal, stabilizing role in European security, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.”

Blank Section (Placeholder)Featured Commentary

Civilization In The Crossfire

by Andrew Robertsvia Military History in the News
Tuesday, May 19, 2015

A media that has generally consigned the advances of ISIS in Iraq and Syria to its inside pages and minor news reports, has suddenly been forced to give them full prominence, not because of the thousands of deaths that ISIS is causing but rather the threat it poses to the splendid urban architecture of Zenobia’s surviving jewel of a city, Palmyra.


From left to right: Bing West, Peter Mansoor, Ralph Peters, Victor Davis Hanson

Military History Working Group meets at Hoover

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

The Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict met for a workshop during October 7 and 8 to chart its long-term objectives and review its new online journal, Strategika.


The Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict examines how knowledge of past military operations can influence contemporary public policy decisions concerning current conflicts. 

As the very name of Hoover Institution attests, military history lies at the very core of our dedication to the study of "War, Revolution, and Peace." Indeed, the precise mission statement of the Hoover Institution includes the following promise: "The overall mission of this Institution is, from its records, to recall the voice of experience against the making of war, and by the study of these records and their publication, to recall man's endeavors to make and preserve peace, and to sustain for America the safeguards of the American way of life." From its origins as a library and archive, the Hoover Institution has evolved into one of the foremost research centers in the world for policy formation and pragmatic analysis. It is with this tradition in mind, that the "Working Group on the Role of Military History in Contemporary Conflict" has set its agenda—reaffirming the Hoover Institution's dedication to historical research in light of contemporary challenges, and in particular, reinvigorating the national study of military history as an asset to foster and enhance our national security. By bringing together a diverse group of distinguished military historians, security analysts, and military veterans and practitioners, the working group seeks to examine the conflicts of the past as critical lessons for the present.

Victor Davis Hanson on War in the Contemporary World — WATCH

The careful study of military history offers a way of analyzing modern war and peace that is often underappreciated in this age of technological determinism. Yet the result leads to a more in-depth and dispassionate understanding of contemporary wars, one that explains how particular military successes and failures of the past can be often germane, sometimes misunderstood, or occasionally irrelevant in the context of the present.

The working group is chaired by Victor Davis Hanson with counsel from Bruce S. Thornton and David L. Berkey, along with collaboration form the group’s distinguished scholars, military historians, analysts, journalists, and military officers.