Defining Ideas

Defining Ideas

Subscribe to receive Defining Ideas. Subscribe »

Explore Research

Filter By:




Enter comma-separated IDs of authors
Enter comma-separated IDs of contributors

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

Antonin Scalia, A Most Memorable Friend

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, February 15, 2016

We didn’t always agree on judicial philosophy, but his legacy will be enduring. 

The White House’s Seven Deadly Errors

by Mark Moyarvia Defining Ideas
Friday, February 12, 2016

Why have so many of America’s military interventions failed over the past decade? 

The Rise Of Crony Capitalism

by Jonathan Maceyvia Defining Ideas
Thursday, February 11, 2016

Affirmative action and collective bargaining are corrupt forms of political favoritism that harm the economy.

Time To End Draft Registration

by David R. Henderson, Chad W. Seagrenvia Defining Ideas
Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Why are some feminists championing an oppressive and coercive institution? 

The Flint Fiasco

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas (Hoover Institution)
Monday, February 8, 2016

The lesson? It’s too dangerous to leave public health and safety to the government. 

Lessons From California’s Drought

by Victor Davis Hansonvia Defining Ideas
Wednesday, February 3, 2016

The state implemented ideologically driven environmentalist policies that caused millions to suffer.

Enemy Of The State

by Mark Harrisonvia Defining Ideas
Tuesday, February 2, 2016

What was everyday life like under the Soviet police state?

Federal Reserve building

Why Fiscal Stimulus Fails

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, February 1, 2016

Interest rate adjustments won’t grow the economy, but overturning unneeded regulations and high taxes will. 

The Demagogues Of 2016

by Bruce Thorntonvia Defining Ideas
Thursday, January 28, 2016

History shows that the Trump phenomenon is business-as-usual in a democracy––and as dangerous.

When College Radicals Obliterate History

by David Davenport, Gordon Lloydvia Defining Ideas
Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Suffering from ‘presentism,’ they want to remove vulgar historical figures from their campuses. 


The Libertarian

Richard Epstein
Richard Epstein presents his classically libertarian perspective on national developments in public policy and the law. The Libertarian archives »

Follow Epstein on Twitter

The Caravan

Visit the Caravan, a periodic symposium on the contemporary dilemnas of the greater Middle East.

With its distinct intellectual assets and ongoing programs of policy-oriented research, the Hoover Institution at Stanford University is a uniquely distinguished contributor to the marketplace of ideas.

Defining Ideas builds on the strength of Hoover’s research: publishing on-line the original work of Hoover fellows and affiliated scholars, as well as that of task force and working group members, whose scholarship lies within the fields of economics, history, law, and political science.

This online journal is the result of our concerted efforts to be part of America’s most important conversations, conveying to the public and to lawmakers an in-depth understanding of key public policy issues. Crucial to this effort is a commitment to develop enduring solutions for the challenges that face our nation and our world—in effect, to advance ideas defining a free society.

Throughout history, ideas have had consequences for the human condition, both beneficial and detrimental. The Hoover Institution’s working groups have been convened to promote ideas that advance freedom, peace, and prosperity. Defining Ideas is intended to illuminate the work of these groups.



While Defining Ideas welcomes comments from readers, we exercise the right to monitor the comments we receive. We will not publish comments that include obscenities, swear-words and vulgarisms; ad hominem attacks; racist expression; rudeness or discourtesy; violations of copyright; or any other transgression of taste or civility that the editors deem unpublishable on a Hoover Institution Web site. We reserve the right, also, to close down comments on a particular essay if the editors believe we have reached "saturation" point.