Hoover Institution fellow Adam White talks about Neil Gorsuch's confirmation hearings, the forthcoming Democratic filibuster, and a potential deal to restore the filibuster for other judicial nominees as a trade for a Gorsuch confirmation.
In a provocative post from last week, Adam White argued that the D.C. Circuit’s 2012 decision in Sherley v. Sebelius could create difficulties for parties who challenge agency actions taken pursuant to President Trump’s executive orders. Adam makes some good points, but I think Sherley is so badly reasoned that its holding ought to count for little in future cases. It’s worth explaining why.
Hoover Institution fellow Adam White's testimony in front of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations (Committee on Financial Services) Hearing: “The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’s Unconstitutional Design.”
featuring Adam J. Whitevia U.S. House Committee on Financial Services
Tuesday, March 21, 2017
The Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will hold a hearing entitled “The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’s Unconstitutional Design” on Tuesday, March 21, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in the Rayburn House Office Building.