What if we could reduce carbon pollution at a lower cost and with fewer government restrictions than we have now?
Our current strategy is to regulate who, what, or how energy can be used, either through emissions rules that favor politically connected groups or through costly subsidies and mandates that often fail to achieve their goals.
But another, more flexible way is to tax carbon emissions. A carbon tax would automatically encourage consumers and producers to shift toward energy choices that emit less carbon – whatever those options may be – because they would cost less relative to high-carbon options.
Economists call this an efficient solution because those who create costs would pay for them, instead of shifting them onto others.
This carbon tax could be made revenue neutral - and more fair to all income groups - by taking all revenue collected and redistributing it to American taxpayers in the form of an equal annual dividend check.
Most importantly, a revenue neutral carbon tax would reduce carbon emissions at a lower cost than today's arbitrary and complex regulatory limits: Winners and losers wouldn’t depend on being politically connected.
They would be determined by who uses – or saves – the most carbon.