The Danger of American Isolationism

Published November 23, 2021

Many Americans argue that an isolationist policy would be better for the United States, and they are not the first to do so. In the late 1930s, the America First Committee strongly opposed US involvement in European conflicts. But as history shows, neutrality and isolationism have never been options for the nation. The United States must maintain a limited but strategic presence around the world to protect the most vulnerable populations and to preserve freedom both at home and abroad.

Discussion Questions:

  1. Why is it essential for America to remain engaged abroad?
  2. What examples throughout history show the consequences of American isolationist policy?

Additional Resources

  • Read “‘America First’ Then and Now,” by Kiron Skinner. Available here.
  • Watch “Projecting the Future of US Foreign Policy,” with Kiron Skinner. Available here.
  • Read “The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Populism, Isolationism, Nativism, and Protectionism,” by Condoleezza Rice. Available here.

Related

Articles

Two Kinds Of War: Ukraine, Gaza, And The Strategic Watershed

The 2025 National Security Strategy has ignited debates about several distinctive assertions, especially the choice of giving priority to the Western Hemisphere, thereby correcting the insufficient attention Washington has long paid to Latin America. In addition, the document may indicate a softening of the perception of China, and it repeats the appeal to European allies to do more for their own defense. Of particular note, furthermore, is the identification of culture as a dimension of security.

October 23, 2026

Articles

Trump’s Capitulation To Putin Is Undermining US National Security

The president’s admiration for the Russian dictator erodes American interests and values.

October 23, 2026

Articles

Who Needs The Bomb?

The Purpose of Nuclear Deterrence.

October 20, 2026