Jump to content

Stanford University

  • News & Events
  • About Hoover
  • Hoover Press
  • Hoover in DC
 
Support Hoover

Get Involved

  • Support the Mission of the Hoover Institution
  • Subscribe to the Hoover Daily Report
  • Follow Hoover on Social Media

Make A Gift

Your gift helps advance ideas that promote a free society.

Donate now

Hoover Institution

  • Research
  • Publications
  • Fellows
  • Library & Archives
  • POLICYEd
  •  
  • Research
    • Overview
    • By Topic
    • By Content
    • By Research Team
    • By Region
  • Publications
    • Overview
    • Hoover Publications
    • PolicyEd
    • Books by Fellows
    • Hoover Channels
    • Fellows Blog
    • Economics Working Papers
    • Video Series
    • Podcasts
    • Hoover Institution Press
  • Fellows
    • Overview
    • By Name
    • By Awards
    • By Category
    • By Expertise
  • Library & Archives
    • Overview
    • Reading Room
    • Collections
    • HI Stories
    • News
    • Exhibitions
    • Digital Newsletter
    • About
    • Visit
  • PolicyEd
    • News & Events
    • About Hoover
    • Get Involved
    • Hoover Press
    • Hoover in DC
    • Stanford University
Top
 

Research

  • By Topic
    • COVID-19
    • Economic Policy
    • Education
    • Energy, Science & Technology
    • Health Care
    • Foreign Affairs & National Security
    • History
    • Law
    • US Politics
    • Values & Social Policy
  • By Content
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Essays
    • Speeches & Testimony
  • By Research Team
    • China's Global Sharp Power
    • Economic Policy
    • Education Success Initiative
    • Energy Policy
    • Foreign Policy and Grand Strategy
    • History Working Group
    • Middle East and the Islamic World
    • Military History
    • National Security
    • National Security, Tech & Law
    • Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific
  • By Region
    • North America
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Russia
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • India/Pakistan/Afghanistan
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa

Publications

  • Hoover Publications
    • Hoover Daily Report
    • Defining Ideas
    • Strategika
    • Human Prosperity Project
    • The Caravan
    • Decision 2020
    • China Weekly Alert
    • Governance In An Emerging New World
    • Hoover Digest
    • Eureka
  • Hoover Institution Press
  • Books by Fellows
  • Hoover Channels
    • Military History in the News
    • California on Your Mind
    • Aegis Paper Series
    • Caravan Notebook
    • The Briefing
    • Immigration Reform
    • Advancing a Free Society
  • PolicyEd
  • Fellows Blogs
    • Economics One
    • Grumpy Economist
    • Victor Davis Hanson
    • EconLog
    • LawFare
    • Paul Gregory's Writings
    • Thoughtful Ideas
    • Show Me The Math
  • Economics Working Papers
  • Video Series
    • Uncommon Knowledge
    • GoodFellows
    • Battlegrounds: International Perspectives
    • Policy Briefings
    • PolicyEd
    • American Conversation Essentials
    • The Numbers Game
    • Fellow Talks
    • Hoover Videos
  • Podcasts
    • Area 45
    • EconTalk
    • The Classicist
    • Law Talk
    • The Libertarian
    • Reasonable Disagreements
    • The Grumpy Economist
    • The Pacific Century
    • Talks from Hoover
    • Education Exchange

Fellows

  • By Name
  • By Awards
  • By Category
  • By Expertise

Library & Archives

  • Reading Room
    • Using The Reading Room
    • Reading Room Services
    • Using the Chiang Diaries
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Collections
    • Digital
    • Geography
    • Subject
    • Oral Histories
    • Audio/Visual
  • News
  • HI Stories
  • Exhibitions
  • Digital Newsletter
  • About
    • History
    • Fellowships
    • Assistant Employment
    • Workshops
  • Visit

    PolicyEd

    • PolicyEd Website
      • Intellections
      • Perspectives on Policy
      • Policy Stories
      • Friedman Fundamentals
      • Policy Briefs
      • Econ1 w/ John Taylor
      • The Numbers Game
      • Blueprint for America

    You are here

    1. Home ›
    2. Peter Berkowitz ›
    3. Law ›
    4. Research

    Filter By:

    Date

    E.g., 2021-01-24
    to
    E.g., 2021-01-24

    Topic

    • (-) Remove Law filter Law
      • Enforcement (44) Apply Enforcement filter
      • Federal (163) Apply Federal filter
      • Immigration (48) Apply Immigration filter
      • Property Rights (25) Apply Property Rights filter
    • Economic Policy (72) Apply Economic Policy filter
    • Education (27) Apply Education filter
    • Energy, Science & Technology (17) Apply Energy, Science & Technology filter
    • Foreign Affairs & National Security (105) Apply Foreign Affairs & National Security filter
    • Health Care (15) Apply Health Care filter
    • History (115) Apply History filter
    • US Politics (158) Apply US Politics filter
    • Values & Social Policy (150) Apply Values & Social Policy filter

    Type

    • (-) Remove Research filter Research
    Clear

    Search

    Peter Berkowitz

    Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow

    Peter Berkowitz is the Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. Since 2019, he has been serving on the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff in the office of the secretary. He is a 2017 winner of the ...

    E.g., 2021-01-24
    E.g., 2021-01-24

    Making and Remaking America: Immigration into the United States

    Research | Essays | by Peter J. Duignan
    Monday, September 15, 2003

    Continued immigration constantly reshapes the demography, economy, and society of the United States. As a country of immigrants, America must respond to three fundamental immigration questions: how many immigrants should be admitted; from where and in what status should they arrive; and how should the rules governing the system be enforced?

    During the 1980s and 1990s, the U.S. Congress responded to growing gaps between immigration policy and immigration reality by making major changes in immigration laws and their administration. In 1986, the United States enacted the world’s largest legalization program for unauthorized foreigners and introduced sanctions on employers who knowingly hired illegal foreign workers. Instead of slowing illegal immigration, however, this program allowed more foreigners to arrive legally and illegally, which prompted another round of reforms in 1996 aimed at ensuring that new arrivals would not receive welfare payments.

    On September 11, 2001, foreigners in the United States hijacked four commercial planes. Two were flown into the World Trade Center towers in New York City, bringing them down and killing 3,000 people. President George W. Bush declared war on terrorists and the countries that harbor them, and Congress enacted legislation to fight terrorism. This includes new measures for tightening procedures for issuing visas to foreign visitors, tracking foreign students and visitors while they are in the United States, and giving immigration authorities new power to arrest and detain foreigners suspected of ties to terrorism. The Immigration and Naturalization Service was abolished, and its functions of preventing illegal immigration and providing services to foreign visitors and immigrants were separated in the new Department of Homeland Security.

    However, anti-terrorism measures have not slowed immigration to the United States. America is poised to remain the world’s major destination for immigrants, and as patterns in U.S. history suggest, most of the newcomers will soon become Americans. However, past success in integrating immigrants does not guarantee that integrating newcomers will be easy or automatic. As immigrants continue to make and remake the country, the United States must develop an immigration policy for the twenty-first century.

    Democracy, Delegation, And Distrust

    Research | Articles | by Adam J. White
    Tuesday, March 12, 2019

    Congress and the Presidency in the Age of Trump.

    Deportation Before Incarceration

    Research | Articles | by Peter H. Schuck
    Tuesday, January 31, 2012
    Why sending criminal aliens home sooner makes sense

    The Right to Private Property

    Research | Essays | by Tibor R. Machan
    Tuesday, October 1, 2002

    If there is one really serious intellectual and cultural problem with capitalism, it stems from the lack of a sustained and widely known, let alone accepted, moral defense of the institution of private property rights.

    Few doubt, in today’s world, that a society with a legal infrastructure that lacks this institution is in serious economic trouble. The failure to respect and legally protect the institution of private property—and its corollaries, such as freedom of contract and of setting the terms by the parties to the trade—has produced economic weakness across the globe. But many also believe that this institution is not founded on anything more solid than the arbitrary will of the government to grant privileges of ownership (for the latest statement of this position, see Liam Murphy and Thomas Nagel, The Myth of Ownership [Oxford University Press, 2002]).

    Without a moral, prelegal defense, the institution of private property, which is the source of a great many benefits to us all, will forever remain vulnerable to the critics, starting with Karl Marx, who said that “the right of man to property is the right to enjoy his possessions and dispose of the same arbitrarily, without regard for other men, independently from society, the right of selfishness.” This essay argues that, contrary to widespread academic sentiments and impressions, the institution of private property rights fully accords with a sensible conception of human morality, indeed, rests on a solid moral foundation.

    The Economic Effects of the Liability System

    Research | Essays | by Daniel P. Kessler
    Tuesday, June 1, 1999

    Liability law has two principal objectives: compensation of parties injured in accidents and deterrence of negligent behavior of potential injurers. Considerable evidence, however, suggests that the current liability system in the United States achieves neither. The system has high transaction costs and fails to compensate injured parties appropriately. There is evidence that liability pressure has distorted firms' incentives for innovation. In the health care sector, liability pressure has led to defensive medicine--precautionary treatments with minimal medical benefit administered out of fear of legal liability.

    This essay summarizes recent empirical research on the economic effects of liability-reducing reforms to tort law. The strategy of this research is to compare time trends in economic outcomes from states that adopted law reforms with trends in outcomes from states that did not, controlling for other determinants of the outcomes in question. Differences in trends between the two types of states provide an estimate of the effect of the reforms.

    In general, this research suggests that reductions in the level of liability improve productive efficiency. But even if these studied reforms improve efficiency, they may not improve the performance of the system in terms of the compensation goal. The essay concludes with a discussion of the potential effects of a wide range of largely untried reforms to the liability system, some advocating radical changes to the allocation of responsibility for accidental injuries, that seek to address both compensation and deterrence goals.

    Discomfort in “Mexifornia”

    Research | Articles | by Victor Davis Hanson
    Sunday, April 1, 2007

    A 2003 book warning against illegal immigration has now found acceptance. The author explains. By Victor Davis Hanson.

    Eyes on Spies

    Research | Articles | by Amy Zegart
    Wednesday, October 12, 2011

    The 9/11 attacks were the clearest possible call for effective national intelligence. Why are we still waiting? By Amy B. Zegart.

    Will Newt Neuter the Courts?

    Research | Articles | by James Huffman
    Wednesday, January 25, 2012
    Why is the liberty-loving presidential candidate taking his cues from FDR?

    After Michigan

    Research | Articles | by Robert Zelnick
    Thursday, October 30, 2003

    In June the Supreme Court issued a definitive—if narrow—ruling that permits the consideration of race in university admissions. This may have been bad law—but was it a bad decision? By Robert Zelnick.

    America at the Bat

    Research | Articles | by Diana Schaub
    Tuesday, September 28, 2010
    On meritocracy and the national pastime.

    Killing Them Softly

    Research | Articles | by Joseph Loconte
    Wednesday, July 1, 1998

    Do needle-exchange programs ward off disease—or consign addicts to death on the installment plan?

    Policymakers in the Dock

    Research | Articles | by Peter H. Schuck
    Saturday, October 1, 2011
    The wisdom of protecting public officials from liability

    Open the Gate

    Research | Articles | by James Kirchick
    Wednesday, July 30, 2008

    James Kirchick on Let Them In: The Case for Open Borders by Jason Riley

    Forty Years of Originalism

    Research | Articles | by Joel Alicea
    Friday, June 1, 2012
    The development and future of a judicial philosophy

    The Gender Refs

    Research | Articles | by Elizabeth Arens
    Saturday, November 1, 1997

    Federal regulators lock arms with college athletic departments to gut men’s sports in the name of equality

    Men with a Mission

    Research | Articles | by Tom Shachtman
    Wednesday, January 12, 2011

    The Scheinman collection brings to life the story of how two friends, a white American and a black Kenyan, helped African democracy bloom. By Tom Shachtman.

    Underage Drinking and the Drinking Age

    Research | Articles | by Carla T. Main
    Monday, June 1, 2009

    The Amethyst Initiative’s harmful remedy

    Expanded Deterrence

    Research | Articles | by Elbridge A. Colby
    Monday, June 2, 2008

    Broadening the threat of retaliation

    Friends and the Law

    Research | Articles | by Ethan J. Leib
    Monday, October 1, 2007

    Can public policy support the institution of friendship?

    Legal Disservices Corp.

    Research | Articles | by Kenneth F. Boehm
    Friday, September 1, 1995

    There are better ways to provide legal aid to the poor

    Pages

    • « first
    • ‹ previous
    • …
    • 12
    • 13
    • 14
    • 15
    • 16
    • 17
    • 18
    • 19
    • 20
    • next ›
    • last »

    More from Hoover

    Featured Fellow

    George P. Shultz

    George Pratt Shultz is the Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished Fellow at the Hoover Institution.

    Learn More »

    Featured Publication

    Ten Years In: Implementing Strategic Approaches To Cyberspace

    This book represents a look beyond theories and analogies to examine the challenges of strategy implementation.

    Learn More »

    Support the Hoover Institution

    Join the Hoover Institution’s
    community of supporters in
    advancing ideas defining a free
    society.

    Find out how »

    colored tree
    Gift icon
    • Research
    • Publications
    • Fellows
    • Library & Archives
    • News & Events
    • About Hoover

    Get Involved »

    Help Advance Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Become engaged in a community that shares an interest in the mission of the Hoover Institution to advance policy ideas that promote economic opportunity and prosperity, while securing and safeguarding peace for America and all mankind.

    The opinions expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.

    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Apple iTunes
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • RSS
    .@RichardAEpstein examines the various issues involved with holding a Senate impeachment trial for a former preside… t.co/5Dxot57GiZ
    Reply Retweet @HooverInst

    © 2021 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University.

    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap (XML)