Jump to content

Stanford University

  • News & Events
  • About Hoover
  • Hoover Press
  • Hoover in DC
 
Support Hoover

Get Involved

  • Support the Mission of the Hoover Institution
  • Subscribe to the Hoover Daily Report
  • Follow Hoover on Social Media

Make A Gift

Your gift helps advance ideas that promote a free society.

Donate now

Hoover Institution

  • Research
  • Publications
  • Fellows
  • Library & Archives
  • POLICYEd
  •  
  • Research
    • Overview
    • By Topic
    • By Content
    • By Research Team
    • By Region
  • Publications
    • Overview
    • Hoover Publications
    • PolicyEd
    • Books by Fellows
    • Hoover Channels
    • Fellows Blog
    • Economics Working Papers
    • Video Series
    • Podcasts
    • Hoover Institution Press
  • Fellows
    • Overview
    • By Name
    • By Awards
    • By Category
    • By Expertise
  • Library & Archives
    • Overview
    • Reading Room
    • Collections
    • HI Stories
    • News
    • Exhibitions
    • Digital Newsletter
    • About
    • Visit
  • PolicyEd
    • News & Events
    • About Hoover
    • Get Involved
    • Hoover Press
    • Hoover in DC
    • Stanford University
Top
 

Research

  • By Topic
    • Economic Policy
    • Education
    • Energy, Science & Technology
    • Health Care
    • Foreign Affairs & National Security
    • History
    • Law
    • US Politics
    • Values & Social Policy
  • By Content
    • Articles
    • Books
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Essays
    • Speeches & Testimony
  • By Research Team
    • China's Global Sharp Power
    • Economic Policy
    • Education Success Initiative
    • Energy Policy
    • Foreign Policy and Grand Strategy
    • History Working Group
    • Middle East and the Islamic World
    • Military History
    • National Security
    • National Security, Tech & Law
    • Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific
  • By Research Program
    • Digital Currency & Electronic Payments
    • Governance In An Emerging New World
    • Regulation & Rule of Law
    • Renewing Indigenous Economies
    • Resolution Project
    • Socialism & Free-Market Capitalism
  • By Region
    • North America
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Russia
    • Latin America & Caribbean
    • India/Pakistan/Afghanistan
    • Middle East & North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa

Publications

  • Hoover Publications
    • Hoover Daily Report
    • Defining Ideas
    • Strategika
    • Human Prosperity Project
    • The Caravan
    • China Weekly Alert
    • Governance In An Emerging New World
    • Hoover Digest
    • Eureka
  • Hoover Institution Press
  • Books by Fellows
  • Hoover Channels
    • Military History in the News
    • California on Your Mind
    • Aegis Paper Series
    • Caravan Notebook
    • The Briefing
    • Immigration Reform
    • Advancing a Free Society
  • PolicyEd
  • Fellows Blogs
    • Economics One
    • Grumpy Economist
    • Victor Davis Hanson
    • EconLog
    • LawFare
    • Paul Gregory's Writings
    • Thoughtful Ideas
    • Show Me The Math
  • Economics Working Papers
  • Video Series
    • Uncommon Knowledge
    • GoodFellows
    • Battlegrounds: International Perspectives
    • Policy Briefings
    • PolicyEd
    • American Conversation Essentials
    • The Numbers Game
    • Fellow Talks
    • Hoover Videos
  • Podcasts
    • Matters of Policy & Politics
    • EconTalk
    • The Classicist
    • Law Talk
    • The Libertarian
    • Reasonable Disagreements
    • The Grumpy Economist
    • The Pacific Century
    • Talks from Hoover
    • China's Global Sharp Power
    • Education Exchange

Fellows

  • By Name
  • By Awards
  • By Category
  • By Expertise

Library & Archives

  • Reading Room
    • Using The Reading Room
    • Reading Room Services
    • Using the Chiang Diaries
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Collections
    • Digital
    • Geography
    • Subject
    • Oral Histories
    • Audio/Visual
  • News
  • HI Stories
  • Exhibitions
  • Digital Newsletter
  • About
    • History
    • Fellowships
    • Assistant Employment
    • Workshops
  • Visit

    PolicyEd

    • PolicyEd Website
      • Perspectives on Policy
      • Policy Stories
      • Intellections
      • Friedman Fundamentals
      • Policy Briefs
      • Econ1 w/ John Taylor
      • The Numbers Game
      • Blueprint for America

    You are here

    1. Home ›
    2. Peter Berkowitz ›
    3. History ›
    4. Law ›
    5. Political

    Filter By:

    Date

    E.g., 2021-04-18
    to
    E.g., 2021-04-18

    Topic

    • (-) Remove History filter History
      • (-) Remove Political filter Political
      • Economic (11) Apply Economic filter
      • Military (7) Apply Military filter
      • US (26) Apply US filter
      • World (16) Apply World filter
    • (-) Remove Law filter Law
      • Enforcement (10) Apply Enforcement filter
      • Federal (53) Apply Federal filter
      • Immigration (8) Apply Immigration filter
      • Property Rights (6) Apply Property Rights filter
    • Economic Policy (22) Apply Economic Policy filter
    • Education (6) Apply Education filter
    • Energy, Science & Technology (3) Apply Energy, Science & Technology filter
    • Foreign Affairs & National Security (19) Apply Foreign Affairs & National Security filter
    • Health Care (4) Apply Health Care filter
    • US Politics (39) Apply US Politics filter
    • Values & Social Policy (38) Apply Values & Social Policy filter

    Type

    • News/Press (4) Apply News/Press filter
    • Research (68) Apply Research filter
    Clear

    Search

    Peter Berkowitz

    Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow

    Peter Berkowitz is the Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. In 2019-2021, he served as the Director of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff, executive secretary of the department's Commission on Unalienable Rights, and senior adviser to the...

    Seminar featuring Hoover senior fellow Peter Berkowitz
    Peter Berkowitz, the Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, presented a talk titled “The Future of Conservatism” on April 15. The event took place at the Hoover Institution.
    E.g., 2021-04-18
    E.g., 2021-04-18

    Berkowitz discusses his recent book on Liberty Law Talk

    Research | Podcasts | by Peter Berkowitz
    Sunday, June 2, 2013

    Peter Berkowitz, the Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, discusses his new book, Constitutional Conservatism. The book deepens Frank Meyer’s conservative fusionist project by adding an Aristotelian and Burkean challenge to both Libertarians and conservatives in America.

    The Pacific Century Reads A Long Telegram

    Research | Podcasts
    Tuesday, January 19, 2021

    Parsing the State Department Policy Planning Staff’s New China Report with Peter Berkowitz.

    A More Powerful Message

    Research | Articles | by Peter Berkowitz
    Friday, April 26, 2013

    American Creed

    Research | Articles | by Peter Berkowitz
    Sunday, July 15, 2007

    What have people meant across the generations when they say, "I believe in America"?

    Europe Stumbles

    Research | Articles | by Peter Berkowitz
    Monday, April 18, 2016

    Europeans have failed to cherish, and now to defend, the nation-state system. Americans must pay heed.

    Read Renewing the American Constitutional Tradition, a new collection from the Hoover Institution Press

    News
    Monday, November 4, 2013

    The Hoover Institution has recently released a new volume edited by Hoover’s Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow Peter Berkowitz entitled Renewing the American Constitutional Tradition.

    JUDGING THE JUDGES: The Judicial Appointments Process

    Research | Videos
    Tuesday, August 26, 2003

    In his first term, President George W. Bush has had difficulty getting his nominees to the federal courts of appeal confirmed by the Senate. The Democrats have taken the almost unprecedented step of threatening filibusters to prevent floor votes on certain nominees. Has the judicial appointments process become the latest victim of bitter partisan politics? Or has the judiciary brought this state of affairs on itself by advancing a doctrine of judicial supremacy, leaving the executive and legislative branches no choice but to resort to political litmus tests for nominees? What does this situation bode for the next Supreme Court nomination? And what, if anything, should be done to reform the process?

    TEST TUBE AMERICA: Immigration

    Research | Videos
    Tuesday, January 22, 2002

    In 1965, Congress voted to change the laws that had restricted immigration into the United States for more than four decades. The Immigration Act of 1965 resulted in a wave of increased immigration that continues today. How do recent immigrant groups compare with those of the last great wave of immigration a century ago? Are they successfully integrating into American culture or threatening America's cultural stability? Should immigration once again be restricted, or should we concern ourselves with helping immigrants assimilate when they arrive?

    THE HIGH (AND MIGHTY) COURT: Judicial Supremacy

    Research | Videos
    Monday, October 27, 2003

    Did the framers of the United States Constitution intend that the Supreme Court be the sole and final interpreter of the Constitution, with the power to place binding decisions on the executive and legislative branches? Or did they intend that the Supreme Court have the final say only on the legal cases that came before it, thus permitting the executive and legislative branches to have wide latitude in interpreting the Constitution for themselves? The former view, that of judicial supremacy, is the dominant view of the Supreme Court today, accepted, for the most part, both within government and in society more generally. Is this view supported by the Constitution? If not, why and when did it arise? Should we support judicial supremacy, or is it time to rein in the Supreme Court?

    ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL: The Separation of Church and State

    Research | Videos
    Tuesday, January 6, 2004

    The First Amendment of the Constitution declares in part that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." What did this amendment mean to the founders who wrote it? Did they intend to establish an inviolate "wall of separation between church and state"? Or was their intent instead to merely preserve religious freedom and prevent the establishment of a national religion?

    ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER: A Conversation with Robert Bork

    Research | Videos
    Wednesday, July 16, 2003

    There are often said to be two competing schools for interpreting the meaning of the Constitution. On one side are those who believe that the meaning of the Constitution must evolve over time as society itself changes. On the other side are those who insist that the original intent of the framers of the Constitution—what they wrote and what their intent was in writing it—is all that matters. Robert Bork is firmly in the latter school. We asked him to explicate his understanding of the U.S. Constitution, using recent Supreme Court decisions as case studies.

    DISORDER IN THE COURT: The Supreme Court and the 2000 Election

    Research | Videos
    Wednesday, November 14, 2001

    On December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States brought an end to thirty-six days of dramatic vote recounts and legal challenges in the state of Florida. The decision let stand the initial results of Florida's election, which gave the state's electoral votes, and thus the Presidency, to George W. Bush. What was the legal justification for the Supreme Court's decision? Should the Court have intervened in the first place? And what precedent did the Court create for future elections?

    THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE'S EXCELLENT ADVENTURE: Should We Abolish the Electoral College?

    Research | Videos
    Monday, December 13, 2004

    As required by the Constitution, the president of the United States is elected not by the national popular vote but by the vote of the Electoral College. In the Electoral College, each state receives as many votes as it has members of Congress. Because every state has two senators and is guaranteed at least one House member, votes of small states count more heavily than votes of large states. Has the Electoral College served the nation well? Or should it be abolished and replaced by a system in which every vote counts the same? Peter Robinson speaks with Jack Rakove and Tara Ross

    A SLAVE TO THE SYSTEM? Thomas Jefferson and Slavery

    Research | Videos
    Monday, January 19, 2004

    When the Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1789, the infamous "three-fifths clause" gave the southern slaveholding states disproportionate power within the federal government. To what extent did this southern advantage help the southerner Thomas Jefferson win the presidency? And to what extent did Jefferson, author of the phrase "all men are created equal," use the power of his presidency to preserve and perpetuate the institution of slavery?

    HOLDING COURT: The Legacy of the Rehnquist Court

    Research | Videos
    Thursday, May 26, 2005

    William H. Rehnquist has served as chief justice of the United States Supreme Court for nineteen years, the longest tenure of a chief justice in a century. How has the Rehnquist Court responded to the key constitutional issues of our times? What will be the philosophical legacy of the man himself? And who will miss him more, liberals or conservatives? Peter Robinson speaks with Kathleen Sullivan and John Yoo.

    OUT FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL: The Supreme Court and the Constitution

    Research | Videos
    Friday, September 27, 2002

    The Supreme Court has the final authority on all matters of law under the U.S. Constitution. But what legal philosophy should the Supreme Court use to reach its decisions? Should the Court merely hand down rules based on the text of a fixed, or "dead," Constitution? Or should the Court apply standards that are based on interpretations of a "living" Constitution that evolves as our society changes? These fundamentally different approaches to constitutional law have created a rift with the current Supreme Court. How serious is this rift? Who's right? And to what extent are these competing arguments merely covers for ideological positions?

    Audio recording of “Out for a Constitutional” (26:48)

    Second Term Challenges

    News
    Thursday, January 24, 2013

    As Barack Obama begins his second term as president of the United States, the nation faces a range of formidable challenges at the intersection of which are national security and law.

    Teaching The Federalist

    Research | Articles | by Peter Berkowitz
    Wednesday, April 16, 2008

    What happens when South Korean students take a close look at American democracy. By Peter Berkowitz.

    Rally round the Constitution

    Research | Articles | by Peter Berkowitz
    Monday, April 20, 2009

    What sustains the conservative agenda? What makes it distinctive and coherent? In a word, principle. By Peter Berkowitz.

    Reading into the Constitution

    Research | Articles | by Peter Berkowitz
    Friday, June 1, 2012
    Peter Berkowitz on Living Originalism by Jack M. Balkin

    Pages

    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • next ›
    • last »

    More from Hoover

    Featured Fellow

    Michael McConnell

    Michael W. McConnell is the Richard and Frances Mallery Professor of Law and the director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

    Learn More »

    Featured Publication

    Negotiating The New START Treaty

    Rose Gottemoeller delivers an invaluable insider’s account of the negotiations between the US and Russian delegations in Geneva in 2009 and 2010.

    Learn More »

    Support the Hoover Institution

    Join the Hoover Institution’s
    community of supporters in
    advancing ideas defining a free
    society.

    Find out how »

    colored tree
    Gift icon
    • Research
    • Publications
    • Fellows
    • Library & Archives
    • News & Events
    • About Hoover

    Get Involved »

    Help Advance Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Become engaged in a community that shares an interest in the mission of the Hoover Institution to advance policy ideas that promote economic opportunity and prosperity, while securing and safeguarding peace for America and all mankind.

    The opinions expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.

    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • Apple iTunes
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • RSS
    .@VDHanson argues that the Biden administration’s policies have emboldened America’s adversaries, doing little to b… t.co/gcmSXLPKCh
    Reply Retweet @HooverInst

    © 2021 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University.

    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap (XML)