Bjorn Lomborg

Visiting Fellow
Biography: 

Bjorn Lomborg is a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution. 

Dr. Bjorn Lomborg is president of the Copenhagen Consensus Center and visiting professor at Copenhagen Business School. His numerous books include The Skeptical Environmentalist, Cool It, How to Spend $75 Billion to Make the World a Better Place, The Nobel Laureates’ Guide to the Smartest Targets for the World: 2016–2030, and Prioritizing Development: A Cost Benefit Analysis of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals

The Copenhagen Consensus Center is a think tank that researches the smartest solutions for the world's biggest problems, advising policy makers and philanthropists how to spend their money most effectively. It brings together many of the world’s top economists, including seven Nobel laureates, to set priorities both at a global and a country or state level. It is the winner of Prospect magazine’s 2016 Think Tank of the Year award in the International Affairs category for think tanks based in the United States. The center’s work was commended by the judges as being “truly innovative and global in its scope.” In the 2018 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report, Copenhagen Consensus was once again acknowledged for having launched one of the top 20 advocacy campaigns anywhere in the world, for the sixth year running. The Economist said: “Copenhagen Consensus is an outstanding, visionary idea and deserves global coverage.”

For this work, Lomborg was named one of Time magazine’s 100 most influential people in the world. In 2011 and 2012, Lomborg was named among the Top 100 Global Thinkers by Foreign Policy “for looking more right than ever on the politics of climate change.” In 2008 he was named “one of the 50 people who could save the planet” by the UK Guardian. In 2005 and 2008, Foreign Policy and Prospect magazine called him "one of the top 100 public intellectuals,” and in 2008 Esquire named him “one of the world’s 75 most influential people of the 21st century.”

Lomborg is a frequent participant in public debates on policy issues. His analysis and commentaries appear regularly in such prestigious publications as the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, the Economist, Foreign Affairs, the Atlantic, Forbes, the Globe and Mail, theGuardian, the Telegraph, the Sunday Times, the Australian, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, and Der Spiegel.

Filter By:

Topic

Recent Commentary

In the News

Bjorn Lomborg’s ‘False Alarm’ Brings Reason To Climate Change Debate

featuring Bjorn Lomborgvia The Epoch Times
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
No matter your predispositions regarding the climate change issue, you’re sure to find something alarmingly objectionable about skeptical environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg’s latest work, “False Alarm.”
Analysis and Commentary

Tackling Corona In India: Why The Sledgehammer Approach Is Doomed To Fail

by Bibek Debroy, Bjorn Lomborgvia The Times of India
Tuesday, June 23, 2020

The corona challenge will likely be with us for a year or more, until we find a cure or a vaccine and it may strike again, after remaining dormant for a while. Thus, it is more urgent than ever to find policy responses that can be sustained and don’t end up leaving India worse off overall.

an image
Interviews

Bjorn Lomborg On Earth Day At 50: A Surprising Success Story

interview with Bjorn Lomborgvia Globe and Mail (Canada)
Thursday, April 23, 2020

Hoover Institution fellow Bjorn Lomborg discusses Earth Day and his new book False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet

In the News

Coronavirus: Long Term Lockdown ‘Not A Sustainable Solution’

quoting Bjorn Lomborgvia News.com.au
Sunday, April 12, 2020

A long term lockdown in a bid to stop the spread of the coronavirus could do more harm than good, a Danish political scientist has warned.

Analysis and CommentaryBlank Section (Placeholder)

Shutdown Is Unsustainable

by Bjorn Lomborgvia Economic Times (India)
Sunday, April 5, 2020

The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic is enormous. But draconian policies to tackle the virus also have colossal costs. Ignoring the trade-offs could land us with one of the worst possible outcomes.

Blank Section (Placeholder)

Hastening Doomsday

by Bjorn Lomborgvia Hoover Digest
Monday, January 20, 2020

Panic over climate change could sabotage the quality of life of billions.

Analysis and Commentary

Fewer And Fewer People Die From Climate-Related Natural Disasters

by Bjorn Lomborgvia Facebook
Thursday, January 16, 2020

Over the past hundred years, annual climate-related deaths have declined by 96%. This is clearly opposite of what you normally hear, but that is because we're often just being told of one disaster after another – telling us how *many* events are happening. The number of reported events is increasing, but that is mainly due to better reporting, lower thresholds and better accessibility (the CNN effect). 

Analysis and Commentary

Empty Gestures On Climate Change

by Bjorn Lomborgvia Project Syndicate
Friday, December 20, 2019

When climate campaigners urge people to change their everyday behavior, they trivialize the challenge of global warming. The one individual action that citizens could take that would make a real difference would be to demand a vast increase in spending on green-energy research and development.

Analysis and Commentary

Humans Can Survive Underwater

by Bjorn Lomborgvia Project Syndicate
Thursday, November 21, 2019

Alarming media stories that twist the facts about rising sea levels are dangerous because they scare people unnecessarily and push policymakers toward excessively expensive measures to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. The real solution is to lift the world’s poorest out of poverty and protect them with simple infrastructure.

Interviews

Bjorn Lomborg: We Are Throwing Money At The Wrong Solutions To Climate Change

interview with Bjorn Lomborgvia Dallas News
Friday, November 1, 2019

Hoover Institution fellow Bjorn Lomborg talks about encouraging policymakers to spend money on countering climate change more effectively rather than spending on feel-good green projects, policymakers must invest in the ideas that will do the most good for the most people.

Pages