Charles Blahous

Visiting Fellow

Charles Blahous is a Hoover visiting fellow specializing in domestic economic policy. His areas of expertise include retirement security, with an emphasis on Social Security and employer-provided defined benefit pensions, as well as federal fiscal policy, entitlements, demographic change, economic stimulus, financial market regulation, and health care reform.

From 2010 to 2015, Blahous served as one of the two public trustees for the Social Security and Medicare Programs. From 2007 to 2009, he served as deputy director of President Bush's National Economic Council. From 2001 to 2007, Blahous served as a special assistant to the president for economic policy, first covering retirement security issues and later encompassing energy policy. In 2001, he served as the executive director of the bipartisan President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security.

From 2000 to 2001, Blahous led the Alliance for Worker Retirement Security, a private-sector coalition dedicated to the fiscally responsible reform of Social Security. From 1996 to 2000, he served as policy director for US senator Judd Gregg (R-NH). From 1989 to 1996, he served in the office of Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY), first as a Congressional Science Fellow sponsored by the American Physical Society and, from 1994 to 1996, as the senator's legislative director.

Blahous’s latest publications include Social Security: The Unfinished Work (Hoover Press, 2010) and Pension Wise: Confronting Employer Pension Underfunding—and Sparing Taxpayers the Next Bailout (Hoover Press, 2010). He is also the author of Reforming Social Security. He has published in a number of periodicals including National Affairs, Financial Times, Politico, National Review, Harvard Journal of Legislation, Baseball Research Journal, and the Journal of Chemical Physics. He was named to SmartMoney's "Power 30" list in 2005. His public appearances include various radio and television programs including "Ask the White House," and speeches on university and college campuses.

Blahous has a PhD in computational quantum chemistry from the University of California at Berkeley and an AB from Princeton University, where he won the McKay Prize in Physical Chemistry.

Filter By:



Recent Commentary

In the News

What Medicare For All Means For Doctors And Hospitals

quoting Charles Blahousvia
Monday, March 18, 2019

Americans generally don’t like the idea of giving up their private health insurance. Hospitals and doctors don’t want them to, either. Private insurers typically pay medical providers a whole lot more than Medicare and Medicaid. And that’s one of the main reasons why many hospitals and doctors oppose Medicare for all proposals that would eliminate or minimize private insurance.

In the News

Editorial: ‘Medicare For All’ Faces Big Hurdles

quoting Charles Blahousvia Providence Journal
Thursday, March 7, 2019

The American health-care system tends to evoke the famous opening of Charles Dickens’ “A Tale of Two Cities”: the best of times, the worst of times.

In the News

'Medicare For All' Is An Expensive Wrecking Ball

with Charles Blahousvia The Hill
Thursday, March 7, 2019

"Medicare for all" sounds good and may make good electioneering slogan sense for presidential candidates like Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.). It is a sales pitch to younger voters and will likely remain popular — at least until the public really understands what an expensive wrecking ball it is.

In the News

‘Medicare for All’: The Impossible Dream

quoting Charles Blahousvia The New York Times
Monday, March 4, 2019

The Brits and Canadians I know certainly love their single-payer health care systems. If one of their politicians suggested they should switch to the American health care model, they’d throw him out the window.

In the News

New AEI Report On The Costs Of Medicare For All By Charles Blahous

featuring Charles Blahousvia AEI
Wednesday, February 27, 2019

In a new AEI report, Charles Blahous – a former public trustee for Social Security and Medicare, and a former deputy director of the National Economic Council – analyzes the likely impact of Medicare for All. A proposed bill introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders, Medicare for All, would be a single payer, national health insurance program that would cover all Americans. While many of the announced 2020 Democratic Party contenders have embraced this policy change, few Americans are informed about the potential costs and consequences associated with it.

In the News

Democrats' Vote-Buying Scheme: 'Free Stuff' For All

quoting Charles Blahousvia The Patriot Post
Wednesday, February 27, 2019

“A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.” —socialist playwright George Bernard Shaw America is indisputably the greatest, most prosperous nation in history. Only a nation as wealthy and secure as the U.S. could afford to indulge the lunacy, greed, and unbridled infantilism we are witnessing today.

In the News

Medicare For All Would Be A Disaster For All

quoting Charles Blahousvia Ricochet
Sunday, February 17, 2019

The Democrats running for president are at it again: they are submitting a completely unrealistic proposal for single-payer health insurance and they aren’t sharing the facts. We must get the word out to everyone that we have to stop this proposal that will take us in a catastrophic direction.

In the News

U.S. Consumption Tax of 5% Could Raise $3 Trillion Over A Decade

quoting Charles Blahousvia Bloomberg
Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Many countries, including members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, raise revenue with a consumption tax levied on incremental increases in the value of goods and services as they move through the supply chain. These value-added taxes -- VAT for short -- generate considerable income and are relatively efficient to administer.

Blank Section (Placeholder)

Running on Empty

by Charles Blahousvia Hoover Digest
Friday, January 25, 2019

The Social Security shortfall has been mounting for years, and soon it will pass the point of no return. We need either a radical overhaul or a new source of funds.

Analysis and Commentary

Increased Workforce Participation Alone Won’t Fix Social Security Finances

by Charles Blahousvia Economics One
Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Last month, Morgan Stanley published a research report projecting that US labor force growth will exceed Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections starting in the 2020s, and also asserting that this faster growth “should” delay Social Security’s insolvency, “perhaps by decades.” Specifically, the report stated that “a faster increase in the pool of covered workers is an important factor in the Social Security Trustees’ ‘low cost’ scenario, which would delay the date at which the Social Security trust fund reserves could become depleted from 2034 to 2062.”