Filter By:

Subtopic

Type

Fellow

Research Team

Use comma-separated ID numbers for each author

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

Analysis and Commentary

Will the Education Gap Ever Close?

by Paul T. Hillvia Hoover Daily Report
Monday, June 30, 2003

Two decades after the report's bleak assessment, we have seen little improvement—a lack that is especially glaring in the minority and underserved schools in big cities.

Analysis and Commentary

A Distinctly American Approach to War

by Bruce Berkowitzvia Hoover Daily Report
Monday, June 9, 2003

Today the United States has a defense policy that aims to minimize the death and destruction of warfare—the very qualities that define war.

Analysis and Commentary

The Social Studies Wars

by Chester E. Finn Jr.via Hoover Daily Report
Monday, May 12, 2003

One found little in the curricular suggestions about who attacked us and why.

DOES ORWELL MATTER? George Orwell

with David Brooksvia Uncommon Knowledge
Monday, April 28, 2003

George Orwell was one of the great journalists and political writers of the twentieth century. His writings on the great political struggles of that century—imperialism, fascism, Stalinism—in books such as Homage to Catalonia, Animal Farm, and 1984, are revered. But is Orwell relevant to the main political and cultural issues of our present day? Or should we read Orwell merely out of an appreciation for language and history?

Analysis and Commentary

The Supply Side of Choice: A Role for Interfaith Coalitions

by Paul T. Hillvia Hoover Daily Report
Monday, April 14, 2003

The choice movement might be winning the policy battle, but an inadequate supply of alternative schools might cause it to lose the war.

Analysis and Commentary

Designer Genes: Will They Wash?

by Henry I. Millervia Hoover Daily Report
Monday, March 31, 2003

Innovations such as gene therapy, even when used for enhancement, should be treated similarly to other analogous medical and quasi-medical interventions.

CASTLES MADE OF SAND: The United States and Saudia Arabia

with Abraham D. Sofaer, As'ad AbuKhalil, Daniel Pipesvia Uncommon Knowledge
Thursday, March 20, 2003

Is Saudi Arabia an ally or an adversary? Saudi Arabia remains an autocratic monarchy, where the rights of women and the press are severely restricted. Saudi money is a principal source of funding for the Wahhabi sect, which promotes a militant form of Islam throughout the Muslim world. Osama bin Laden and fifteen of the nineteen participants in the attacks of September 11 came from Saudi Arabia. And yet, for more than 50 years, the United States has treated Saudi Arabia as an ally. Why? What role have Saudi oil and Saudi oil money played in shaping our relationship? Is it time to recognize that Saudi Arabia may threaten American national interests? If so, what should U.S. policy toward Saudi Arabia be?

BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: The Supreme Court and the Texas Homosexual Conduct Law

with Pamela S. Karlan, Douglas W. Kmiecvia Uncommon Knowledge
Friday, February 28, 2003

A case currently before the Supreme Court challenges the constitutionality of the Texas Homosexual Conduct Law, which in 1974 legalized heterosexual sodomy but not same-sex sodomy. Does the Texas law violate the constitutional rights of homosexuals, or are states permitted to pass such laws if they choose? If the Supreme Court does strike down the Texas law, what implications will that have for other civil rights that gays and lesbians are seeking, such as same-sex marriage?

OFF TO THE RACES: The Supreme Court and Affirmative Action

with Vikram David Amar, Douglas W. Kmiecvia Uncommon Knowledge
Friday, February 28, 2003

The Supreme Court will soon announce its decisions on two cases that are being called the most important for affirmative action in a quarter century. These cases both challenge the use of racial preferences in the admissions policies at the University of Michigan. On one side of the legal dispute over the Michigan policies are those who argue that creating racial diversity on college campuses is a "compelling interest" that justifies the use of certain types of racial preferences in the admissions process. On the other side are those who argue that any system that rewards people solely on the basis of race is unconstitutional. Who's right? And how will the Supreme Court's decision affect the future of affirmation action?

THE POPULATION BOMB REDUX: Is Population Growth a Problem?

with Nicholas Eberstadt, Paul Ehrlichvia Uncommon Knowledge
Tuesday, November 12, 2002

In the past century the earth's human population has quadrupled, growing from 1.5 billion in 1900 to about 6 billion today. By 2050, it is estimated that the global population will reach 9 billion. In 1968, a young biologist named Paul Ehrlich wrote a best-selling book called The Population Bomb, which sparked an ongoing debate about the dangers of overpopulation. He argued that population growth was destroying the ecological systems necessary to sustain life. So just how worried should we be? Is population growth a problem or not? And if so, what should we do about it?

Pages

Virtues Task Force