Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Issue 16

What will be the immediate strategic repercussions, if any, of the scheduled radical pruning of the size of the American military?
Background Essay
Poster Collection, US 4642, Hoover Institution Archives.
Background Essay

Size Isn’t All that Matters

by Angelo M. Codevillavia Strategika
Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Repercussions of quantitative changes in military forces are relative strictly to those forces’ specific missions and deployments.

Featured Commentary
Poster Collection, US 1153, Hoover Institution Archives.
Featured Commentary

The U.S. Cannot Wish Away Its Present Security Concerns

by Kiron K. Skinnervia Strategika
Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Grand strategy requires states to have a long-term plan. It also requires that means and ends be clearly articulated and calibrated to each other. The Obama administration’s long-term plan appears to shift U.S. economic and military assets away from the Middle East and toward Asia. The Middle East, however, shows no signs of relinquishing its role as the world’s central battleground. Furthermore, means and ends are mixed together as priorities under the Obama doctrine.

Featured Commentary

Pruning the U.S. Military: We Will Do Less But Must Not Do It Less Well

by General Jim Mattisvia Strategika
Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Clearly America's military will continue to shrink. Across our body politic from fiscal conservatives to those who support increasing entitlements to those unimpressed with the last ten or forty years of America's role on the international stage, there is no longer in Washington adequate vision or sufficient political will to restrain the downsizing of our military.