Defining Ideas

Defining Ideas

Subscribe to receive Defining Ideas. Subscribe »

Explore Research

Filter By:




Enter comma-separated IDs of authors
Enter comma-separated IDs of contributors

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

Too Moderately Moderate

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, January 24, 2011

Obama’s rhetoric sounds conservative, but his policies are as liberal as ever.

an image

What Motivates Terrorists?

by Jessica Sternvia Defining Ideas
Friday, January 21, 2011

Ideology is not the only or even the principal reason why individuals join terrorist groups.

Classical Liberalism: The Best Antidote to Incivility

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Tuesday, January 18, 2011

In the partisan aftermath to Tucson, let’s remember that we have better political alternatives than Krugman’s caricature of capitalism.

an image

A Market Solution For Our Water Wars

by Terry Anderson, Gary D. Libecapvia Defining Ideas
Wednesday, January 12, 2011

If water allocation is left to legislatures and courts, rather than the marketplace, shortages will persist.

Robert Reich: Obama's False Friend

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Sunday, January 9, 2011

President Obama should ignore his strident critics on the left and continue to ease to the center.

an image

The Future of Christians in the Middle East

by Habib Malikvia Defining Ideas
Friday, January 7, 2011

Islamism threatens religious pluralism and democracy in the region, as tragic events in Egypt and Iraq remind us.

an image

Morality Degraded: The Academy’s "New Science" of Odd Behavior

by William Damonvia Defining Ideas
Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Moral excellence cannot be explained by a science that reduces morality to biological impulses.

The Tale of How Insulin Came to Market

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Sunday, January 2, 2011

This inspiring story proves that medical innovation occurs in spite of, not because of, government regulators like the FDA.

Epstein Portrait

Is the Supreme Court Tilting Right?

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Tuesday, December 21, 2010

On the limits of empirical social science—and the New York Times writers who employ it.

Epstein Portrait

Better to Profile Than to Pat Down

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, December 13, 2010

The TSA’s invasive pat downs are not the problem. Its policies on profiling and unionizing its employees are.


The Libertarian

Richard Epstein
Richard Epstein presents his classically libertarian perspective on national developments in public policy and the law. The Libertarian archives »


Follow Epstein on Twitter

The Caravan

Visit the Caravan, a periodic symposium on the contemporary dilemnas of the greater Middle East.

With its distinct intellectual assets and ongoing programs of policy-oriented research, the Hoover Institution at Stanford University is a uniquely distinguished contributor to the marketplace of ideas.

Defining Ideas builds on the strength of Hoover’s research: publishing on-line the original work of Hoover fellows and affiliated scholars, as well as that of task force and working group members, whose scholarship lies within the fields of economics, history, law, and political science.

This online journal is the result of our concerted efforts to be part of America’s most important conversations, conveying to the public and to lawmakers an in-depth understanding of key public policy issues. Crucial to this effort is a commitment to develop enduring solutions for the challenges that face our nation and our world—in effect, to advance ideas defining a free society.

Throughout history, ideas have had consequences for the human condition, both beneficial and detrimental. The Hoover Institution’s working groups have been convened to promote ideas that advance freedom, peace, and prosperity. Defining Ideas is intended to illuminate the work of these groups.



While Defining Ideas welcomes comments from readers, we exercise the right to monitor the comments we receive. We will not publish comments that include obscenities, swear-words and vulgarisms; ad hominem attacks; racist expression; rudeness or discourtesy; violations of copyright; or any other transgression of taste or civility that the editors deem unpublishable on a Hoover Institution Web site. We reserve the right, also, to close down comments on a particular essay if the editors believe we have reached "saturation" point. 


The opinions expressed in Defining Ideas are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.