Defining Ideas

Subscribe to receive Defining Ideas. Subscribe »

Explore Research

Filter By:

Topic

Type

Author

Enter comma-separated IDs of authors
Enter comma-separated IDs of contributors

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

an image

Real Prudential Regulatory Reform vs. Dodd-Frank

by Charles Calomirisvia Defining Ideas
Monday, December 13, 2010

Dodd-Frank does not address the causes of our financial crisis. Let's consider reforms that do.

an image

Is Kemalism Dead in Turkey?

by Zeyno Baranvia Defining Ideas
Monday, December 13, 2010

Turkey was founded as a secular republic, but today it is embracing Islamism over secularism.

an image

Profile in Courage: Harvey Mansfield

by Emily Esfahani Smithvia Defining Ideas
Monday, December 13, 2010

The professor on the death of courage and the crisis of liberalism in the West.

an image

Multiculturalism Uber Alles?

by Russell A. Bermanvia Defining Ideas
Monday, December 13, 2010

Germans debate the role that multiculturalism, Islam, and Muslim immigration play in their culture.

Charles Phelps

How does good technology go bad?

by Charles E. Phelpsvia Defining Ideas
Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Incentives and information for providers and consumers could bring some rationality to this process

James Robinson

Property Rights and African Poverty

by James Robinsonvia Defining Ideas
Monday, March 15, 2010

Africa is not doomed to poverty, but it must improve its property rights institutions.

this is an image

Cap and Trade: An Inconvenient Tax

by Terry Anderson, Gary D. Libecapvia Defining Ideas
Friday, October 30, 2009

The cap and trade proposal of the Democrats could be economically counterproductive and environmentally negligible.

Scott W. Atlas, MD, is the David and Joan Traitel Senior Fellow at the Hoover In

Where’s the Benefit?

by Scott W. Atlasvia Defining Ideas
Sunday, October 25, 2009

Beneath piles of proposals, nothing but harm

John Raisian, the Tad and Dianne Taube Director of the Hoover Institution.

Joining the Policy Dialogue with Defining Ideas

by John Raisianvia Defining Ideas
Thursday, October 22, 2009

The mission of the Hoover Institution is to promote the principles of individual, economic, and political freedom, private enterprise, and representative government.

John F. Cogan

Doubling Down on a Flawed Insurance Model

by John F. Cogan, R. Glenn Hubbard, Daniel P. Kesslervia Defining Ideas
Thursday, October 15, 2009

Obama’s health care plan takes the problems of the current system and makes them worse.

Pages

The Libertarian

Richard Epstein
Richard Epstein presents his classically libertarian perspective on national developments in public policy and the law. The Libertarian archives »

 

Follow Epstein on Twitter

The Caravan


Visit the Caravan, a periodic symposium on the contemporary dilemnas of the greater Middle East.

With its distinct intellectual assets and ongoing programs of policy-oriented research, the Hoover Institution at Stanford University is a uniquely distinguished contributor to the marketplace of ideas.

Defining Ideas builds on the strength of Hoover’s research: publishing on-line the original work of Hoover fellows and affiliated scholars, as well as that of task force and working group members, whose scholarship lies within the fields of economics, history, law, and political science.

This online journal is the result of our concerted efforts to be part of America’s most important conversations, conveying to the public and to lawmakers an in-depth understanding of key public policy issues. Crucial to this effort is a commitment to develop enduring solutions for the challenges that face our nation and our world—in effect, to advance ideas defining a free society.

Throughout history, ideas have had consequences for the human condition, both beneficial and detrimental. The Hoover Institution’s working groups have been convened to promote ideas that advance freedom, peace, and prosperity. Defining Ideas is intended to illuminate the work of these groups.

 

COMMENTS POLICY

While Defining Ideas welcomes comments from readers, we exercise the right to monitor the comments we receive. We will not publish comments that include obscenities, swear-words and vulgarisms; ad hominem attacks; racist expression; rudeness or discourtesy; violations of copyright; or any other transgression of taste or civility that the editors deem unpublishable on a Hoover Institution Web site. We reserve the right, also, to close down comments on a particular essay if the editors believe we have reached "saturation" point. 

 

The opinions expressed in Defining Ideas are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.