Defining Ideas

Defining Ideas

Subscribe to receive Defining Ideas. Subscribe »

Explore Research

Filter By:

Topic

Type

Author

Enter comma-separated IDs of authors
Enter comma-separated IDs of contributors

Support the Hoover Institution

Join the Hoover Institution's community of supporters in advancing ideas defining a free society.

Support Hoover

Clean Air Vs. Dirty Hogs

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Tuesday, August 14, 2018

The common law of nuisance is the best defense against the costs Smithfield Foods has imposed on citizens.

Harvard’s Asian Exclusion

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, August 6, 2018

The University’s tortured defense of its treatment of a meritorious minority

When Courts Play Public Nuisance

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, July 30, 2018

A billion-dollar judgment against two companies for old, innocuous circulars. 

Kavanaugh And The “Chevron Doctrine”

by Michael McConnellvia Defining Ideas
Monday, July 30, 2018

Expect this legal issue to come up during the confirmation hearings.

Regulatory Dark Matter

by Henry I. Miller, John Cohrssenvia Defining Ideas
Thursday, July 19, 2018

Executive branch agencies like the FDA are abusing their power by issuing excessive rules and guidelines.

Progressives Come After Brett Kavanaugh

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, July 16, 2018

Overwrought liberal critics cast the judge as a right-wing ideologue.

Why Europe Gets No Respect

by Victor Davis Hansonvia Defining Ideas
Thursday, July 12, 2018

The continent is ossifying into irrelevance.

Abortion, Compelled Speech, And The Supreme Court

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, July 9, 2018

The next Justice should safeguard religious liberty from government intervention.

Clearing Up Misconceptions About Health Savings Accounts

by Scott W. Atlasvia Defining Ideas
Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Reformed HSAs represent a clear pathway to affordable, quality care for everyone.

Donald Trump’s Trade Travesty

by Richard A. Epsteinvia Defining Ideas
Monday, July 2, 2018

Presidential hubris is no substitute for rational policy.

Pages

The Libertarian

Richard Epstein
Richard Epstein presents his classically libertarian perspective on national developments in public policy and the law. The Libertarian archives »

 

Follow Epstein on Twitter

The Caravan


Visit the Caravan, a periodic symposium on the contemporary dilemnas of the greater Middle East.

With its distinct intellectual assets and ongoing programs of policy-oriented research, the Hoover Institution at Stanford University is a uniquely distinguished contributor to the marketplace of ideas.

Defining Ideas builds on the strength of Hoover’s research: publishing on-line the original work of Hoover fellows and affiliated scholars, as well as that of task force and working group members, whose scholarship lies within the fields of economics, history, law, and political science.

This online journal is the result of our concerted efforts to be part of America’s most important conversations, conveying to the public and to lawmakers an in-depth understanding of key public policy issues. Crucial to this effort is a commitment to develop enduring solutions for the challenges that face our nation and our world—in effect, to advance ideas defining a free society.

Throughout history, ideas have had consequences for the human condition, both beneficial and detrimental. The Hoover Institution’s working groups have been convened to promote ideas that advance freedom, peace, and prosperity. Defining Ideas is intended to illuminate the work of these groups.

 

COMMENTS POLICY

While Defining Ideas welcomes comments from readers, we exercise the right to monitor the comments we receive. We will not publish comments that include obscenities, swear-words and vulgarisms; ad hominem attacks; racist expression; rudeness or discourtesy; violations of copyright; or any other transgression of taste or civility that the editors deem unpublishable on a Hoover Institution Web site. We reserve the right, also, to close down comments on a particular essay if the editors believe we have reached "saturation" point. 

 

The opinions expressed in Defining Ideas are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.